MORAL POWER, by Dr. Steven Nur Ahmed

How can our earth have such plenitude of life, clean water, and dense forests just 12,000 years ago, but now have become reduced to increasing scarcity of life, unclean water, and diminishing forests along with rising human misery after only a few hundred years? What is the cause or what is to blame? I think that history reveals a clear relation between the choices we make and planetary enhancement or degradation.

We cannot blame technology in and of itself because technologies of whatever kind are merely instruments of human creation and use. Technologies do not have a practical purpose independent of the design given to them by human beings. Technologies are only purposeful when guided by the hand of a human being.

The technologies which are designed, mass produced, and marketed by corporate power elites filter down to billions of people in global markets and into homes worldwide. Then, when used on a mass scale by people who do not understand the harm such technologies do, the harm done to earth grows to immeasurable depths.[1]

The mass use of a single technology like a cellular phone or automobile by billions of human beings on any given day is causing mass irreparable damage to the fabric of our moral lives and to life forms on earth. The fact is that moral depravity and earthly depravity are positively correlated.

The signs of global resource scarcity, environmental imbalance, and rise in human misery point to specific choices which some human beings have been making with cold indifference to other better alternative choices which could have been made by them.  Their choices are ‘moral choices’.  Moral action and its opposite called negligence are the context of all human relations.

Both the Bible and the Holy Quran make the same argument by means of an allegorical story.[2] The first human beings were made guardians of a Garden; imagine that the Garden symbolizes the Earth.  A guardian is a moral overseer. Their prime directive from God was to do no harm and break no promises.  After committing harm and breaking a promise, the first human beings were condemned to physical, emotional, and spiritual degeneration in perpetuity. It is called: the fall from grace. That allegorical story implies the necessity of making moral choices so that we can have healthy social and environemental relations.

In law school, I studied the law of Torts. I studied a branch of Tort called the Tort of Negligence.[3] The central proposition in the law of negligence is simple. It is that ‘every person has a duty of due care so as not to harm another’. When one breaches his or her duty of due care to other persons and harms them, they are defined by law as having been negligent.  They are defined as having breached ‘the social contract.’[4]

Before we act, we should always consider what behavior is the best behavior so that we reduce the chance we will do harm to another including all other animals. Undeniably, the law of Negligence is a moral principle. The law of Negligence is a civil law implicit in all criminal laws; it is a fundamental principle in all human groups. The fact that human groups exist at all makes moral principles self-evident.

When a person is presented with more than one choice of action in a circumstance, the question is: which option is the best choice out of several alternatives? There is always the best choice of action out of several options in every given circumstance.

Some scholars argue that human beings are fundamentally selfish.[5] But the best choice cannot simply be that choice which optimizes what is good or pleasurable for the person making the choice. That would be an act of irrational selfishness.[6] For what is good for one person or even several persons or even a whole nation may be disastrous for billions of other persons in the short and long run.

Evidence exist to support that claim. Look at the last several thousand years of what I call the ‘Empire Game’. The Empire Game has been and is now an unmitigated disaster for all humanity. The Empire Game has even assumed the title of ‘World History’ implying that all other facets of human history are less important than it.

But there is also what are called in law ‘acts of omission’. Sometimes, under some circumstances, even making no choice can be an act of negligence which causes harm to another. Therefore, the argument that ‘some choices are amoral’ meaning morally neutral is a false premise because individuals and groups always make choices they define as good or pleasurable for themselves. And those choices even if it is a choice not to choose any course of action always cause effects. Therefore, there is no such thing as an ‘amoral’ choice because all choices and even decisions not to choose have unintended consequences on other people and the earth.[7]

For that reason, the issue of moral power and its effect on human and other environmental relations is the central problem facing us today. It is a central problem facing descendants of slaves. If that problem is not solved quickly, there will be no hope for mass survival during this age of global dysfunction.[8]

The political, corporate, and religious power elite casts a very long shadow over billions of people on this earth of ours. At the end of the day, their shadows convert to social and spiritual privation for all those living in their shadow. In a sense their shadow blocks rational sunlight from reaching into the lives of many people. It makes us less able to live moral lives because it stresses us to be less cooperative and more irrational and conflictual in relation to our neighbors and earth.

For subordinate people, everywhere, the life of the power elite is the antithesis of the life lived by those in their shadow. The elite, whether they be political, religious, or business elites, live a life of wealth and intellectual supremacy at the biological, economic and social expense of all people subordinate to them. 

What can we do? Can we hypothetically get a grasp of the gravity of our social and economic problems? Let’s imagine some possibilities and follow them through to a conclusion. Let’s do a thought experiment.

Hypothetically speaking, if every descendant of slaves who is incarcerated in State, Federal, County, and City jails were released tomorrow; and

Hypothetically speaking, if every descendant of slaves who is released vowed to never commit another crime; and,

Hypothetically speaking, if no crimes were committed by descendants of slaves released from prison thereafter; and,

Hypothetically speaking, if all other descendants of slaves vowed that they would never break the law; and,

Hypothetically speaking, if all descendants of slaves in fact did not commit felonies ever again in the United States, then what would happen?

First, there would be an extra million and a half descendants of slaves living mainly in cities but also in small towns throughout the United States.

One million and a half more descendants of slaves would immediately add about 2% to the African American unemployment rate which already stands at about 16% or twice that of White unemployment.  That would make the unemployment rate for African Americans about 18%.   What can we compare an 18% unemployment rate to?  For that, we turn to the 20th century.

During the height of the 20th century’s great depression, the percentage of unemployed Americans was 25%. Thus, if there were a 2% rise in unemployment, descendants of slaves would experience an economic depression equivalent to the great depression wherever they lived in the United States in 2017.

Secondly, if no crimes were committed by descendants of slaves, the criminal justice system would collapse unless it seized upon another ethnic group to criminalize. Let’s assume the criminal justice system did not seize upon another ethnic victim. What would happen?

An unintended consequence of mass lawful behavior would be a second wave of unemployment adding to the 2% rise in black unemployment; but this time among whites. The ripple effect would expand far and wide into the economy. Share value in private for profit prisons stock would literally become worthless. Billions of dollars would be lost over night making wealthy white investors poor.

What would happen is that the “1,719 state prisons, 102 federal prisons, 942 juvenile correctional facilities, 3,283 local jails, and 79 Indian Country jails as well as in military prisons, immigration detention facilities, civil commitment centers, and prisons in the U.S. territories” would get significant Federal, State, County, and city budget cuts. That would include cutbacks in criminal courts with district attorneys, public defenders, police officers, and private criminal lawyers becoming unemployed along with everyone who works in the criminal justice system from administrators, correctional officers, to janitors. It would affect over 500, 000 individual employees and their families. In dollar terms, let’s say a cutback of about $85 billion dollars nationwide.  State, Federal governments would lose money because they would no longer have a justification for increased taxation of citizens to support the criminal justice system. Look at the graph below to get a bird’s eye view of the magnitude of economic dependence governments and corporations have on crime and the incarceration of descendants of slaves.

What would all those descendants of slaves choose to do under such circumstances? The economic characteristics of the United States are changing so fast that even the most educated Americans are continually having to retool their skills to keep up with technological change. How can under-educated ex-felon descendants of slaves be expected to do so?

 

Robots at the “Hannover Messe” trade fair in Hanover, Germany, April 2014[9].

The fact is that there would be no jobs for most of them aside from agricultural employment. The reasons that they would have nothing to do center around 1) their general lack of education. Here are the facts: “About 41% of inmates in the Nation’s State and Federal prisons and local jails in 1997 and 31% of probationers had not completed high school or its equivalent. In comparison, 18% of the general population age 18 or older had not finished the 12th grade.”[10] The educational characteristics of incarcerated descendants of slaves change at a glacial pace. The same educational characteristics hold true in 2017.

A second reason is that negative stigmata would be attached to them for having been incarcerated and simply for being ‘black’ in this white supremacist society.

Descendants of slaves have never been able to even minimally compete with the dominate white culture on any level. Some say ‘well what about sports’? I say to them that ‘No descendent of slaves owns a professional sport team in any league or sport.’ That holds true generally in the entertainment industry as well. Some others will argue, ‘well we can restart Black Wall Street such as the one which existed in Tulsa, Oklahoma in the 1920s.’ I say, “one cannot step twice into the same river.” Times, circumstances, and especially sentiments among Descendants of Slaves completely rule out that possibility. Some others will say: we can join a church or Masjid or Temple. I say that none of those American religious institutions will bite the hand which feeds them. They have become instruments of the banking system debt slavery and therefore of Wall Street.

Furthermore, that kind of change is not likely now because of ethnic integration and the rapidity of technological changes taking place. Add to that the increasing dysfunctional social life of most descendants of slaves particularly those million and a half individuals in our thought experiment now out of prisons and jails.  It leads to one conclusion. The only rational choice, the best choice, for descendants of slaves would be the choice to exercise moral power. Simply obey all laws. 

[1] Include under technology genetically modified organisms.

[2] Genesis Chapter 2, Torah; Holy Quran 2:30

[3] The Tort of Negligence literally means: the harm of negligence

[4] The Social Contract. Jean-Jacques Rousseau

[5] Charles Darwin, Origin of Species, 1849; Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene, 1976

[6] All human beings are intinctual or behaviorally unconsciously driven but we are also conscious and rational when fully developed. Moral decisions arise out of rational deliberation. Out of that kind of deliberation society is made possible. There is initially an imbalance in favor of instinct. But over time conscious rationality more or less increases.

[7] I once heard George Soros say that his decisions are ‘amoral’. Soros is in conscious denial or lying.

[8] William Vogt, Road to Survival; chapter 2, ‘Biotic Limits’, 1944

[9] Erik Brynjolfsson, Andrew McAfee, and Michael Spence July/August 2014

[10] Education and Correctional Populations, Bureau of Justice Statistics, by Caroline Wolf Harlow, Ph.D., 2003

TO MY COLLEAGUE AND FRIEND: PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CAMEROON, by Kifon Emile

TO MY COLLEAGUE AND FRIEND: PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC
OF CAMEROON 

The world is watching us as we move through this highway of history – with thoughts that we make the same errors of the past and stumble into doom. Vigilance, diligence and governance are the key, if we shall cross this highway safely into the promised land of greatness.
Ultimate Governance Code. [UGC]

At this convenient crossroads where the stakes are like jagged mountains, a diligent anticipation of the fate of our lives and that our people is not only necessary but an imperative.

Before I proceed, may you accept my warm regards from the cold part of the world where I presently reside in Oakland – not far from your beautiful daughter Brenda in Los Angeles with whom I believe our dialogue and collaboration shall be fruitful in constructing a brighter 4th generation Africa, and rightfully so.

The days of vain pettines and vile antagonisms have faded; they’ve proven to be  weaknesses and we must look at things through a new prism.

There are many reasons why this is the ideal time to face each other and confront the truth that lies before us and the world: how similar our paths have been, how determined we are and how we want a better place for our nation and the world.

We are both of modest parents who could afford only the minimul care for us; we both went to the seminary after which we were dismissed allegedly for accusations of misconduct – ushering a divorce from Mother Church (my superior told me).

We graciously admitted our fate and increased love for our new Mother – the State, for whom we shall make hard choices that will affect our lives considerably. So, while you went to France to study political science, I went to the Catholic University to study Public Policy where we each applied ourselves diligently with the hope of being better stakeholders in the building of our new found love with determination  especially since we never had the chance and would not have had the chance to do so in the former.

We both had resolutely admitted our fate and conceded to serve the Lord in the vineyards of politics while celebrating the holy sacrament of justice and hard work in the sanctuaries of the poor and the needy while using the new scriptures of the Constitution to strengthen our frailty and guide us along our chosen path.

More interestingly, even though the outcome of our choices have not been the same, the similarities still remain poignant.For instance, in 1982, you became the president of the republic of Cameroon, the same year I was born. Allegorically, we are age-mates; but things have turned out different from me, and perhaps in understanding the divide, you’ll be able to see clearly the situation that most Cameroonians of my age experience and what they wish for the nation they so much love.

At the age of 33, you were appointed director of cabinet of the Ministry of National Education in 1964 and at 34 you were Secretary General of the Ministry of National Education in 1965. There is no doubt that our tracks changed tremendously when we both left the university. While I was working at the Institute for Governance for Central Africa and assisting at the Catholic University after graduate studies, you had one of the highest appointments in government at a very young age which no other young person today can claim to have.

Being ambitious and devoted, you worked to gain the spotlight for being nominated as successor of our former president in November 1982. The vigor and optimism of your youth is no different from what many young people of my age exhibit. The main difference is opportunity; and it is on this note that I think we should reflect on what we want for our society and lives of our young people.
Justice: The foundation of opportunity “The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law.” [Aristotle] Two things remain unchallenged in society: the difference of humans by virtue of their potentials and their inequality by reason of their circumstances.

Above these is consecrated the equality of man, and the reconciliation of these two poles using the term justice [what we had often preferred to call justics in opposition to misguided Greek translation and its semantic deficiency that distort the art of reason and fairness in social dynamics]. Difference and inequality naturally create insecurity, thereby imposing the necessity of the State as the arbiter of fairness as it assumes the role to legislate to increase security while ensuring that each person is not only safe but also happy – opportunity.

Cameroon, as you’ve often emphasized, is a State of law, and the characteristic of this attribute is threefold: fair treatment or respect of each citizen, respect for property as well as strangers and respect for the law. Rhetoric shall not save us at the point, and will only make your rule look like an abuse to the memory of history and reason if I fail to say things the way they are. 

Because opportunity nominally is a fluid concept that can take any form, we shall track it from its manifestations or outcome. While most Cameroonians like you had jobs immediately they graduated from University in the 60s, young people of my generation, most of the time with a master’s degree can’t find any job, and the brightest and hardworking ones are obliged to keep up with an underemployment estimated by others to be about 75%. As a result, there’s a consequent delay in marriage, low consumption, low productivity, low creativity, low public participation; a general malaise which creates lack of trust for oneself and in the government whose ultimate outcome will be corruption and informality as a means of survival.

But lack of opportunity is not the cause of lack of opportunity. It is caused by lack of justice whose absence is either through what we have done or through what we have failed to do. In both cases, you’ll agree with me that we have failed enormously.

For justice to be just, it must be characterized by its accessibility, affordability, accountability, reliability, sustainability, impartiality and adaptability.

A venerable friend and thinker had pointed out that even if justice is blind, it is not dumb, deaf and crippled. In Cameroon, justice has sight, and remains dumb, crippled and deaf.

In the seminary, we were both taught to forgive when something wrong is done. But in politics, wrong doings are sanctioned, and forgiven only when the designated punishment have been completed. But during your reign, citizens known for their corruption and indifference have been appointed to high office, none declaring their assets, and usually leaving office richer than their rightful allocations would permit.

By addressing the issue is justice, we can say that we have started building a nation. Citizens will develop love for creativity and innovation, while others will find it best to invest in our nation which will provide jobs for our people.
Justice is not simply an institution [judiciary] as commonly admitted. It is a structural value encrypted in the values of the daily lives of citizens. That is why the national Justice Platform must be instituted so that citizens from all parts of the nation can voice their concerns, and make necessary mobilizations for change wherever necessary.

Governance: The Excellence of Transparency

“There is no great nation without a dirty past; there is no small nation without a great future” [UGC]. But when the smallness of a nation ceases to be a transitory phase towards self-realization, it becomes a pathological situation that merits deliverance, not the type administered by the priest from the comfort of his altar but the type that arise from society through revolt and revolution. In fact, revolution becomes divine whenever stagnation or regression becomes the norm. Governance is the ultimate revolution.

Governance should not be an office, specific in its definition like we currently have in the prime minister’s residence. This only looks like an attempt to coat an environment which is not ready to incorporate such practices in its daily activities. Governance is not a structure but a structural value.

It is under your rule that Cameroon was rated the most corrupt nation in the world, in 1998 and 1999, a stigmata that remains on the nation till this day. What went wrong? There was a breach of contract; the State had been confiscated into the hands political charlatans who sub-contracted public service to our citizens desperate to improve their lives. With the lack of trust, corruption became the currency of exchange, and you did nothing till the whole world shamed us for our misery.

But again, the failure of governance is simply rooted in our misunderstanding of the State, which is easily privatized [including the Unity Palace] and authority becomes not the manifestation of the State’s availability but of an individual’s strength and merit, by extension, that of his tribe and people. This primitive logic, not far from what others call the religious state in opposition to the rational state, is in my opinion a catalyst in the criminalization of our institutions.

This misrepresentation, which you’ve participated in promoting over the years, letting citizens dance for you, praise you for being their savoir, and deifying you are some of the things which must be looked with contempt and resentment. Lack of governance, like the absence of justice creates poverty and as one thinker said: “Poverty is the parent of revolution and crime.”

As you know, we must distinguish ourselves from the Church where everything revolves around the priest, his altar and his God. We had been on this path, and it embeds in its core asymbolic violence that rationality and time won’t redeem. The State revolves around the citizen: organically and materially, and the Constitution is used in defense of this ultimate value – citizenry. As such, in its operations, the State performs a customer service job to the consumer [citizens] who, like in all other businesses holds the primordial role of center of gravity of institutional endeavors.

Governance, being directly related to the creation of riches, should be implemented in all government contracts whose follow-up must be seen progressively from the time of its allocation, implementation and realization. Such a system has been initiated in Ghana and puts everyone on check.
In this light, the Transparency Fortress must be instituted in all bureau where facts and ideas are not only made transparent but also carefully scrutinized by the public and necessary updates made.

Sustainability: The Indispensability of Technology

“Politics is more difficult than physics.” [Einstein] In other words, technology is simple, but building people is hard. Therefore, while working on nation building, we must possess the finest of technological art.

There is no doubt that you had never prepared our android generation for this digital age, and believe that their recourse to the farms will solve the nation’s problems. Certainly, a good advice for the wrong reason and in an inappropriate age. Wrong reason because you want to transfer the blame of unemployment on the unwillingness of our youth to return to the farms when their peers in other parts of the world are building apps, phones, computers smart devices, investing in geo-engineering, exploring space or creating other sophisticated tools to govern the world including us.

Wrong age, obviously since we live in a post-modern era where agriculture must be accompanied not only by adequate technology but also with sufficient funds to meet both competitively as well as productivity in a context characterized by environmental degradation and imperial trade policies that cripple young farmers. Of course, your own pineapple farm in Mvomeka is run with the same standards like any of its European competitors, both in technology and funding: two things which you’ve strategically deprived from this generation.

‘Stingray’ is a rare technology which you recently purchased from the USA for huge sums of money to enable you track officials’/citizens’ conversations who ‘envy your throne’ or backbite against you. Interestingly, when most of them were arrested, they pleaded not guilty of the charges laid, but you knew that the main reason for their carceral state was because they had the pretentious desire to undo your reign – something which you aren’t ready to admit, as of now.
The presidentialization of technology and security, which apparently is important, remains a vice when invested for the promotion of the top in opposition to the base where most of our citizens exist. In fact, they don’t even exist, they struggle to survive. To exist is to thrive.

I decline to acknowledge the funds from your bureaucratic eleemosynary, whose impact has yield no fruits for over thirty years. No nation ever progresses through charity but through justice and investment. I refer precisely to the case of Arthur Zang who invented the cardiopad used to detect remote cardiac heart risk problems in distant villages. You awaited him 20 million FCFA but no one knows where this funds came from. Since the institutions designed to administer to excellence have failed, you intervene not to correct them but to confirm that you are chief scientist, attributing rewards to exemplary ones while letting institutions fail.

Sustainability, though comprising more of human value, is becoming more and more an indispensable tool in shaping means adaptability to modern society, and defines ultimate his progress or extinction. On this note, the wretchedness of the nation’s technological backwardness is not only frightful, shameful but dangerous. This technological labyrinth, as you know is confirmed by our inability to build our own bridges, take hold of our energy supply, water or construct mega-infrastructure etc. Being aware of this vacuum you had constantly invited the Chinese or French to assume the role of building major projects in the nation: the solar panel at your compound, the multi-purpose stadium in Yaounde, the Lum-pangar dam etc.

Technology is not an option in modern society, it is the nature of society itself. The android generation, which has not deliberately made this choice, has showed its willingness to adapt with the hope that its leaders will make the right option of investing in what really matters.

The victories of technology are greater than its vices. Instilling form in society is possible not only through the enforcement of law but through the creation of adaptable technology which will govern not only markets, education, regulate society but above all control public administration while increasing productivity in each case.

Admittedly, we must always ask ourselves how a small country like North Korea, under embargo could thrive technologically, creating computers and mobiles phones, while a ‘free country’ like Cameroon remains unable to build its own bridges, dams or other public infrastructure. We wonder why children in China and Japan are able to create smart technological devices while a whole sovereign nation needs foreigners to manage its electricity. It is legitimate to question why young men in the Middle East can fabricate grenades while our military sometimes can’t use the weapons they’ve bought from foreigners.

We must not be absent from the post-modern world, which is invariably governed by technology. That is why it must be considered a state of emergency to institute the Quantum Fortress designed for the replication of the most vital technological feats of our age, that will be applied progressively in matters of health, military, infrastructure and agriculture.

With the Quantum Fortress, we can revolutionize the nation, by teaching hard core technology to our kids in their early age, while enforcing excellence to those who are already in institutions of higher learning. This is easy. It takes just a change of mentality. We can create the next google, Facebook, Amazon and LinkedIn in Africa.

Even though you’ve failed to do this in the past 33 years, I think that it is right for you to catch up with this vacuum by implementing this project which is necessary for the survival of the nation. And of course, the rationalization of our society would be impossible without these rational tools which all other nations have greatly employed to their advantage.
Order: The primacy social plannification

In order for our people not to repeat the fate of Sisyphus – which had seemingly been the case for the past 400 years, I beseech you, to consider this of sovereign importance. Although the primary contract of the State with its citizens attributed it with the role of providing security and control – depending on the circumstances, it must be underlined that such control and security can be made possible only when there is order in the society through a judicious social, structural and infrastructural planning.

As you know, citizens from all over the world, can buy and sell from the new platform call Amazon because they’ve clear addresses in well-defined societies where each person can be traced carefully to his/her residence. But in sub-Saharan Africa and Cameroon in particular, no one can buy and sell through amazon. This shows we are cut off from the world and how our opportunities are limited. Although you appear to be right by inviting the young people to develop love for agriculture, you forgot to underline that they’ll need to sell these goods in an open market where you had already made partnerships [accord de Cotonou] for others to sell their good in Cameroon at cheap rates thereby threatening the survival of local initiatives.

But if we can’t identify our citizens numerically, we can we identify them socially and structurally. This idea, which I know shall be a case of objection in its preliminary proposition, constitute a vital instrument of governance – rationalization. In some parts of the world, it is called a social security number, encrypted in the vertebral column of the State, where each citizen can be tracked in all its activities using just one specific number. This would limit forgery, double identity, corruption, informality and the endless confusion that we always encounter with regards to when a person died, when a given certificate was issues or when s/he applied for a specific government benefit.

This may take time. And if we don’t achieve this, we leave the next generation with the burden to think about their own problems as well as providing solutions for the problems that we have created during our time. We must not seek to attain development in our own way. It is a futile initiative to think that we can do things using our ways which have often failed us while expecting to get great results.

The rationalization of citizenry, and the plannification of society have a psychological impact on the configuration of brain processes of our citizens. In order words, through this induction process, we believe that order in society plumbs unto the way individual conceive reality and shapes their thinking thereof. In a disordered society, the mind wanders, often aimlessly in its quest for form and meaning; while in an orderly one, the mind sees form and order from which it derives inspiration to create more order, riches, wealth and greatness derived from his environment.

Because public administration is the vertebral column of society, it follows that its rationalization and excellence in operations must never be compromised in any case. Withoutthis, we work in vain. But rationalization comprises the ability to embrace the digital era fully, where all public records, files and information are saved electronically, where citizens can contact their public providers using quick and effective modern communication means directed by appropriate technology. In this logic, its interoperabilty thereof shall be indispensable as control, spending and time will all be maximized.

Personally, I don’t know the address of the presidency, it doesn’t appear anywhere, and most public institutions still remain in the pre-colonial logic where files are kept hidden in from the public in archives that need special acrobatic skills to determine their location.

Your failure in this domain has no appeal. Your only recourse is to institute the Order Tribune which in every sector will ensure that the highest standards of plannification and order or established while making sure that they be sustainable; for we can’t continue in this vicious cycle of doing and undoing every day, every year endlessly.

Business: The Imminence of Cooperation

Roosevelt had often complained about his British counterparts for their trickery irrespective of the fact that they were allies. During the time of Churchill, he made this declaration: the problem with the British is that when you make a deal with them they always end up with 80% and you’ll be left with 20%. The Americans had long ago discovered that the greatest cruelty is that of cooperation, disguised under diplomatic etiquette.

A Japanese diplomat had mentioned on our national television almost a decade ago that: “we have no resources in Japan. The only thing we’ve is our brains.” In other words, he was indirectly saying that we don’t have brains even though we got the resources. We must reflect on this! And if this can’t make you mourn, then we have understood nothing about past, present and future.

Now, back to Roosevelt, if the British could treat the Americans in that way, as the great State’s man had declared, how do you think they’ll treat us? Let common sense decide.

One of our top civil servants, a professor of honorable standing had mentioned the abject state of our cooperation capabilities which had led some plenipotentiary members to even leave the country due to shame. This seems to be a general trait which commands insistence. It is in this light, that I had mentioned in the Governance Code that cooperation is synonymous to war with the ultimate objective to conquer, destroy while keeping in mind that the opponent has

It is in this light, that I had mentioned in the Governance Code that cooperation is synonymous to war with the ultimate objective to conquer, destroy while keeping in mind that the opponent hassimilar motives, with the only difference that he is crueler and has even dangerous weapons at his disposal.

Not even the UNO, whose cruelty [Cote d’Ivoire, Libya, RD Congo or Rwanda] everyone knows can be trusted. They all participate in the structural fortress of what I call the trans-Atlantic Empire, what others call NATO. The court of Hague is simply an outshoot of this empire which persecute those who don’t pay allegiance to the center while defending corrupt and deadly stooges.

Even in its most polite form, diplomacy is always a violent game. The case of China is worth mentioning. In its cooperation with Africa countries, it uses the slogan of South-South Cooperation. But when it cooperates with the North, it considers them too as equals with high standards and expects to be considered as such.

Taking the example of Libya, in 2011, there were about 30.000 Chinese in the country with an investment of almost 100 billion US dollars. But China refused to vote against the no-fly zone. It remained neutral which in diplomacy simply means it stood against Libya and sided with America. Russia did the same. The reason is clear: we can trade, but we choose to remain with the Northerners even in their violence against others, since we have a greater market there.

Let’s make this brief, dear friend of old. While Arab nations of the Middle East have succeeded to establish an Eldorado for their people with the resources they have, our citizens continue to suffer despite the immense potentials of our country. I must concur with a source which demonstrated that Cameroon has the most diverse resources in the whole of Africa, yet remains one of the poorest with lamentable state of infrastructure and governance indicators. We can do better than this. But there is a trick in these cooperation which, thanks to a venerable expert and imminent economist, I we have some points why some projects never get off the ground.

Hold your breath, president and friend, some of these companies of the West win bids for the exploitation of resources not to exploit them! But to keep hold of them so that others won’t get it. Extraction projects in China takes just a few years. In Cameroon and Africa, they take at least a decade. This is deliberate. The same company that is extracting Cobalt from Zambia will win a contract in Cameroon, but won’t extract it because it doesn’t want to compete with itself. And doesn’t want to let it go to others. All delaying schemes will be devised while the country

And doesn’t want to let it go to others. All delaying schemes will be devised while the countryremains poor and desperate, waiting for partners to make the right steps. After a decade or so, the value of cobalt will be reduced or worth nothing.

That is exactly what is happening with oil right now.
The advent of Chinese in competing for public contracts has modified the game but much hasn’t changed. As demonstrated above, the Chinese sometimes work with the West to better exploit us. The French win extracting rights, give it to the Chinese to build or wait for the Chinese companies to make a command from their industries before production begins. While owning the resources, we become the by-stander.

After slavery, most of the plantations were transferred to Africa, Cameroon included, so that we could become a plantation economy and plantation nations. After that, extractive investments followed [oil, minerals et timber etc.], and now with alcohol and tobacco companies. While these dangerous investment avenues spread all over Africa, technology and refining investments are transferred to Asia [China, India, Philippines]. Investments, from a global perspective is not a charity concert where anyone gets anything, even though we know there is a manifested scheme to keep some people in plantation economy characterized by consumption of dangerous substances [alcohol and tobacco].

But it is up to us to prove that we have educated people in these fields that would attract such high skilled investments in all domains. And most especially, be able to create similar companies with high skilled technologies. A cooperation that does not lead to evident transfer of technology is a danger to the nation.

Coffee and chocolate are some of the points which I should mention. While in France and in Switzerland where you often visit, you’ll discover that all the coffee bags have labels from other countries but none from African countries but we produce them. This criminal international scheme can only be put to an end when we decide to refine our own products or refuse to produce them. These are our two choices.

We had been in permanent siege for a long time, and you’ve not made things better in any way. It is for this reason that the creation of the Cooperation Fortress is indispensable in determining that state of our business relations with other nations, companies and individuals.

Knowledge: The Sanctity of Education

There is a misguided opinion from our nation as well as from international organization about education as a human right. In fact, it is due to this erroneous view that you decided to make primary schools free of tuition while pledging to lower the cost for secondary education. This misconception gave you the impression that you’ve accomplished your objectives by opening the doors of education to the children of our land.

As I mentioned in the Ultimate knowledge Code, what constitute a human right is knowledge, not education per se. What therefore is the difference?
While the first refers to a set of information transmitted from one person to another, the second refers to the transfer of potentials from one person to another which empowers and enables the receiver to excel in innovation, creativity and definitely productivity.

As you can see, dear friend, our schools are not different from concert grounds where the display of information is exhibited at various heights. In some cases, they’re like touristic sites where young people to go delectate their vision on the site of one another, or more correctly, in some cases, they’re simply mortuaries where the energetic brains of our youth are put to sleep with anesthetic theoretical information that bears no practical value in their lives. This characterization is particular to our State universities which have never featured among the best in Africa, regrettably.

Dr. Bernard Fonlon, one of our former ministers of health, who was appointed by president Amadou Ahidjo, had indicated three things that characterize a university: a library, research center and a press. The first serves as a reservoir for information, the second for the production of knowledge while the third for the exposition of knowledge. As you can notice, he never mentioned classrooms and amphitheaters, which is the main characteristic of our institutions of higher learning. You cannot claim to be ignorant of this nor say it is not your responsibility. It is the life of our nation at stake!

Taking the case of Yaounde I and II where I visited a couple of times, it could easily be noticed that most of the books are old and pages are missing from the most useful ones. The biggest mistake from the library in Yaounde I is that that the good books, new and updated are in the third floor mainly for doctoral students and professors. Lo, we are not in a cast system in Cameroon or in an academic Jim Crow. 

This is a grave pedagogic miscarriage because our young people, who are being initiated into the institution of higher learning must have access tothe finest information that will enable them to change their lives as well as that of the nation. Granted, some of these young people have been responsible for tearing our pages from books which are meant for the use of everyone, regrettably. But it is the role of the university to put security measures, security cameras to make sure that these evil acts don’t occur. We must not starve our young people from knowledge when we know that they have minimum financial resources to buy books and keep up with the high cost of living in the city – if we can call it so.

On our laboratories, we should know that the strength of a nation of a function of its research centers. While most researchers prefer to create their private laboratories, Pr. Victor Anomah, our laboratories are not yet designed for the production of knowledge. They are still grounds to illustrate what was done. Of course, the future of our nation depends of what we decide to do with our laboratories and researchers. I had already mentioned on the paragraph of technology, that a Quantum Fortress is a matter of urgency, bringing together the brightest minds in each domain for the production of knowledge that will lift the nation to its rightful and honorable state. It is with the results of their productions that our products shall have some value, and constitute a point of reference for the younger generation.

The academic allegiance to France in terms of publications, education and reference is something of old, and must be by-passed through the implementation of this project.

In our younger years, we both believed that someone was the way, the truth and the life. But in nation building, Knowledge is the way, the truth and the life. And we must agree with Plato who said “ignorance is the root of all evil” contrary to what we had preached using the scriptures.

Whatever you decide to do with the power that you have, you must keep in mind that the fate of our young people cannot be compromised through mediocrity of its educational system. My friends who lecture in these universities as well as those doing their doctoral programs have confided to me that the situation is shameful and must be declared a state of emergency. But I must not precipitate my call to this, because it refers to a general malaise which I must complete its elucidation.

The institution of the Knowledge Vault is therefore matter of primary importance, where research is done not necessarily to invent [a lot has already been invented] but simply to replicate and produce. Here, our brightest sons and daughters shall be invited to reside and serve.

Autonomy: The of Greatness of Sovereignty

Three things have always characterized sovereignty, the compromise of which jeopardize the welfare of the State and the wellbeing of its citizens: military, law and banks. In other words, guns, order and money. When the exercise of these three elements cross boundaries, the nation ceases to be a State like all others but becomes an empire; and when a nation lives under the influence of the army, law or money of another nation, it ceases to be one, but becomes a colony.
It becomes apparent, that sovereignty is not a judicio-political myth, theoretically erected into law, it is a strategic fortress defended by corporate capabilities and protected by the law.

As you can remember, even though France had been an independent republic since 1789, it is only in February 1960 that General de Gualle declared that France has now become an independent State. This is when it officially announced that they had acquired a nuclear weapon. Without the ultimate weapon, no nation can claim to be really sovereign, regrettably. Some naïve pundits of liberalism and democracy had defended the idea of power and greatness without a nuclear weapon.

Like children who believe that they are big because they have the height of their parents, this child-like reflexions are only characteristic of thinkers whose frail minds have understand nothing about realism and thymos. Remember that Charles de Gualle had refused military aid from John Kennedy when the latter wanted to grant him Polaris missiles. De Gualle wanted only one thing: the nuclear weapon. When the nuclear cooperation was concluded, he handed the project to Jacques Mitterrand, who will later become the president of France in 1969 to intimidate other nations with his newly acquired weapon.

With the recent circulation of tension in North East Nigeria which has sustained some casualties in Cameroon, you had called France for help and recently Obama sent some technical military advisers to assist in the fight against this threat. I had noted in a verbal conversation, that the presence of foreign military in another country inevitably jeopardizes sovereignty but also shall incite these agents of evil to become even more inventive in their attacks against civilians.

Regrettably, it is exactly what is happening now, and there is no evidence that the foreign assistance had actually been of help. In fact, the greatest help that you can receive, like de Gualle, is to get a transfer of competence that will enable you develop the same capabilities that would fight this vice to its core.

Of course, when agents from the Atomic Agency landed in Cameroon, they made you understand the benefits of signing a non-proliferation treaty, which they could not oblige their own allies to do so. This was a strategic blow, which I think you must apologize to our generation. My concern is simple: what is your interest and that of the nation in signing a non-proliferation treaty when our military cannot produce a Kalashnikov? The Geneva convention on War which I also call “the legalization of war – according to our terms” participate in this complex role of defining structural means of instituting imbalance end violence.

The creation of laws is an attribute of sovereignty which the nation has always done it’s best to uphold. But it has been timid in a number of ways: pressure from the IMF to accept structural adjustment programs – on the terms of the IMF, which proved to be detrimental to the economy and the nation, pressure to accept the ACP cooperation. But the instances where we ourselves have abused our own sovereignty through unscrupulous manipulation of the constitution is even more dangerous. In fact, as much as you had been a victim in undermining the sovereignty of the nation, you had also been a perpetrator of this vice thereby weakening the rule of law, which in the eyes of citizens give them the right to tailor laws to their interests and modify, distort or adjust them as they see fit.

As mentioned already, the State is a corporate organ with sovereign rights, mandated to legislate on public interest. Money is the means by which this is done. The use of the FCFA is a violation of this basic principle of sovereignty, which after 50 years of government you should have known that it is detrimental and made the appropriate steps in changing the situation.

From the aforementioned facts, it appears that Cameroon is a colony and not an independent State as you had made us to believe. Granted, this may need more strategic resources than common sense would suggest. But it is possible!

The Central Bank must regain its fundamental rights, while currents deposits in France must find its way back to BEAC. As indispensable stakeholders in nation-building, we request that our nation must be in control of all our investments.
On this note, the creation of the Sovereign Office should be considered imminent and implemented with the duty to investigate and promote all areas in which the sovereignty of the state is being endangered and how it can be protected, promoted and defended.

Diversity: The Pride of Ethnicities

The opening proposition in the preamble of our Constitution rightly states: “Proud of our linguistic and cultural diversity, an enriching feature of our national identity…” The inscription of diversity as a feature our identity is consecrated by our laws, although sometimes derelict. Diversity defines our essence and no prolixity of this subject should be deemed legitimate, but the neglect of this fact would only demonstrate another naïve perception on what constitute the fiber of our existence. The subsequent proposition makes even clearer the role of this diversity: “we constitute one and the same Nation, bound by the, same destiny, and assert our firm, determination to build the Cameroonian Fatherland on the basis of the ideals of fraternity, justice and progress.”

I acknowledge the degree fixing quotas in public administration, which recently had been a contentious issue in the School of International Relations IRIC, but we know that this is just the tip of an iceberg of the many irregularities that plague the application of law in the nation. There are reasons for this irregularities.
As the commander-in-chief, you’ve never hesitated to make appointments with particular preference to those from the south/center, whose kleptocratic and gerontocratic rule have contributed in undermining the rule of law and the State as a result. Having survived an assassination attempt in 1984, you had thought that those who hold your interest will be those of the south.

Again, the interest of the nation is more important than the interest of the president, regrettably. Your perpetual rule, I must insist has contributed in the institutionalization of tribal governance [or tribalization of institutional governance] while the rest of the nation recloses in proclivity of their enclaves. Although democracy must not be considered a tribal ngangi where

Although democracy must not be considered a tribal ngangi whereeach person takes turn necessarily, it must not be a tribal oligarchy either with dubious alliances of greedy power brokers. I agree with Achille Mbembe, a fellow citizen in self-exile of laudable intellect, that the fight for democracy befalls on us as citizens and we must be ready to pay the price. But again, a greater responsibility lies on those who control the wheels of the nation to make diligent decisions for the progress of the State and its citizens.

We have seen our lowest ebbs, and in the depths thereof one thing remains characteristic: our ability to exploit our differences for the disadvantage of one another. Slave trade, colonization, neo-colonization, and corruption are symptoms of the instrumentalization of diversity.
While we have never known violent tribal and religious confrontations, the threats remain, as can betray itself anytime.

I admit that nation-building is a process that takes time, but I also must underline that it must not take forever. With about 250 tribes, it takes great ingenuity to govern this diversity and establish a peaceful cohabitation.
As a result, the creation of a Diversity Law must be implemented to make sure that citizens from other cultural obedience feel protected by the law.
Democracy: the cradle of modern day nationhood “He who modifies the Law in the name of democracy kills the law and as well as democracy.” [UGC]

Democracy is a means and not an end. But it is regrettably for this reason that most intellectuals of Cameroon stripped themselves from all integrity by violating the sanctity of objectivity and common sense in remaining silent or justifying the modification of the constitution of 2008. What is worse, legislators, invested to represent the base (the people), resolutely represented either themselves or the top (the president). When everyone represents you, who will represent us? This concern lies at the heart of how we define the State.

We both agree, following historical and theoretical conformity, that the State belongs to the people (demos) while at the same time conceding their rights to the former under for the protection of all (republic). It is the old commerce of liberty and freedom traded in favor of

It is the old commerce of liberty and freedom traded in favor ofsecurity. This commerce, a social contract, it must be underlined, is not exclusive in its definition nor in its realization, and more specifically does not follow strictly the rules of supply and demand – security does not become cheap because there is abundant freedom. On the contrary, one is a factor of the other.
In this light, the republican State cannot be said to preempt the demos State in any case.

More practically, it is against the rule of law – and the welfare of the State to beseech the legislature to bow to the executive in favor of republican imperatives against demos necessities. This linear equation – demos vs republican, remains a constant in modern societies. As you know, you root for republican values under the pretext of the demos, a malevolent scheme which mobilized the public – allegedly, to send motions of support in favor of your stay in power ad vitam.

Perhaps you’ll want to question how the presence of one person can change the dynamic of a whole nation. To this, we shall refer to similar cases: Moa, Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore, Lula da Silva of brazil, or their contraries like Hitler, Stalin, Idriss Deby of Chad or Idi Amin of former Uganda. Structural edifice and coherence are more important than infrastructural. Therefore, you cannot anticipate the requiem of the State before of a few infrastructural projects as the pathetic prime minister declared shamelessly. In fact, the longevity in power as a pretext of accomplishing some infrastructural goals is only symptomatic of a State that has failed to be a State: continuity, progress, integrity and gratuity.

The scheme maneuvered in 2008 worked and you were able to modify the constitution and defy the State – the people. This time, some sycophantic epigones not only call on you to become be their president but to organize early elections so that you can achieve your development goals. Like helpless children fearful to see the death of their father, crave that he lives forever even when they see him at an advanced age, laden with sickness, tiredness and helplessness.

Being shameless to assume their responsibility as adults, they lay back and send emotionless motions of support for your stay in power and the anticipation of elections. There is no doubt that perpetual rule, characterized by scarcity and terror has had a serious mental toll on the population, including the intellectual and political elite who now seem to be deprived to common sense and objectivity. Like a psychotic ignorant of his own malaise, these leaders openly betray to the world their immaturity and the misery of their choices. This illustrates more

This illustrates moreclearly the importance of a socio-therapy to be administered even though in this case, only the sick can properly heal themselves.
In the World Governance Board, we decided to classify/rate the merits and performance of heads of States and send publish the results to the world. The preliminary analysis of this project brings forth a blink and blurred image of your rule comparable to those of the fallen States of Somalia, Syria and Burundi.

Because you’re running out of time to emulate the good examples of Mandela, Abdoulaye Wade or Goodluck Jonathan, your palliative move will be to ensure a peaceful transition as you retreat giving way for a new era of public administration in Cameroon. Our people should not live in a democratic caliphate of gerontocratic obedience.

The Democracy Office, therefore must be put in place to ensure that values of respect, change of regime are kept sacred and applied diligently in all elective offices. 

Foreign Affairs: on International Considerations

“I fear the Greeks, especially when they bring gifts.” [Temeo Danaos et donas ferentes] Virgil had said in Aeneid, II, 49.

The West, with whom we have had a long genealogy of contact, has a history which is based principally on the domination of one theory over another, one society over another or one religion over the other: implicit or explicit violence, I must admit regrettably. Based on the notion of dialectics, we can trace this to the days of Sophocles when he crafted the myth of Oedipus, where the son finally killed the father, married the mother. Later, Plato with the idea of conquering the body using the illumination of the mind; Marx, with the proletariat overthrowing the bourgeoisie; or capitalism where the freedom and equality are preached in order to make others unfree and unequal; but also modern day quantum physics whose finest definition of the real ends with the principle of uncertainty [Heisenberg] or incertitude to be more specific.

This eternal opposition of forces is just one of a kind in the academic milieu, which socially had been characterized by class division, religious segregation, racial criminality and cast stigmatization. Over the ages depending on location, each of these have been implemented to various degrees with different levels of realizations.

It all makes sense when we remember that one of the founders of Europe, Attila the Hun, of Germanic descent has a famous expression which seems to leave its trace in modern nations of the West: “All horns serve a useful purpose to do evil,”

It all makes sense when we remember that one of the founders of Europe, Attila the Hun, of Germanic descent has a famous expression which seems to leave its trace in modern nations of the West: “All horns serve a useful purpose to do evil,”and “trample the weak, hurdle the dead.” Evidently, doing evil, as you admittedly can see, is part of a useful purpose, following the western logic.

Today’s scenario of Libya, cote d’Ivoire, Rwanda, Congo, South Africa are just a few examples to illustrate how the propagation of evil is marketed as a salvatory mission that is good and useful. From its cruelest manifestations to its loftiest diplomatic forms, the objective is always the same: conquer and subdue.

Dear colleague of old and president of the nation, it is in this logic, that relations with other nations must be seen, all, and most particularly the west with whom a history of cruelty, intimidation, violence, injustice, and spite have been almost normalized, leaving a scar in the historic memory of our people.

I concur that you are not naïve about all these, but it shall be of great negligence not to insist on what I consider a case of sovereign importance.
We had already mentioned in the Governance Code that there is no International Organization in the world. All, with the exception of none are structures created by a nation or a few nations to defend their interests – directly or indirectly. What becomes of others? A tiny filament, at the extremity of the imperium whose sole purpose is to provide brut labor, resources till they exhaust themselves to extinction.

On this note, our diplomats have a special role to play. We can’t afford to be losers all the time. We stand a unique special of benefiting of all the great things that the world offers, but we must change how we position ourselves with regard to the world. We can’t save hide money in Swiss banks, make corrupt deals, maintain our people under suppression while expecting to be respected in the world.

International prescience is determined by internal governance and economic power but by the type of speech we make at the UNO or what class of flight we take. It is by relying on our own institutions and creating our own flights.
As a consequence, the creation of the International Fortress is of prime importance in making sure that our standing in the internal scene meets the standard and dignity of humans.

Enemies: The Fortress of Solidarity

“A nation can be destroyed either from inside – weakening its laws, or from outside by strengthening its dependence” [UKC].

Open Societies and its enemies of venerable Popper demonstrated how societies [West] which respect the law turn to be open, thereby being weakened by their tolerance for the intolerant. But such societies always thrive, for, with the rampart of the law, they thwart the intolerant without necessarily being intolerant.

Cameroon, like most countries of the South is open technically open but semantically closed. The first by virtue of unenforced laws, porous boundaries, defenseless diplomacy, offensive vulnerability, etc. while the second by reason of the reclose nature of our traditions, ethnic proclivity, archaic procedural governance, gender biases and ultimately a governance mediocrity marked by technological bankruptcy, optional public accountability and the contentment of minimal bottom-line.

Therefore, while Open Society is elaborated in opposition to its enemies, we in the closed societies become our own enemies. Or, closed using the wrong postulate.

It follows that our concern here is how to strengthen our laws in such a way that it constitutes but our defense and our offense at the same time. As you can remember, we had pledged in our younger age to be enlightened by the Constitution and not to enlighten it. But you had spitefully decided that you shall enlighten the Constitution instead of letting it enlighten you. This has led to your successive modification of the constitution in 1992 and 2008 in order to enable you clench your fists to the realms of power even when the metacarpals thereof are getting weaker and uncertainty gets stronger while the nation plunders into political and economic stalemate. This is a blow to the rule of law, and the honorability of history.

The downward spiral of a wavering administration only reveals more clearly the face of the real enemy. Yes, “we have met the enemy, and he is us” [Walt Kelly]. How did we become our own enemies?

The first culprit for this rule of flaw is the perpetual ruler whose pontifical governance has made the State to look more like a modern democratic caliphate: one people submissive under Biya Mvondo. The im-personification of the law alienates the person from the law, while manipulation of the law only manipulates the citizens who obey it.

“We are the enemy,” when leaders fail to represent the people but represent either the head of central principality, themselves or their comprador hierarchies. We citizens, we failed because we listened to these demagogies, designed to keep us in slumber even when our leaders enjoy the comfort of their palaces. We failed because we had participated in breaking laws, paying bribes, seeking the easy and investing less in creativity, innovation and hard work. We failed the State, which counted on us to hold our leaders accountable, charge them and judge them on the tribunal of history. We failed because we praised them in their wrong doings, devising irrational logics with the hope that we shall get dividends of their eleemosynary. We failed because we had imitated the wrong examples [drinking, smoking and informality] but leaving aside technology, arts, inventions and ingenious writings.

We do not want to continue on the erring path that leads inevitably to perdition. That’s why we are resolved, not only to invest in hard work and creativity, but above all in honesty and governance. We refuse to leave to our children this heritage of disgrace and shame which none of us will be proud to narrate to the next generation. We refuse to let our children suffer, enter into this vicious cycle of complicity and indifference in the face of irrationality, division, greed, laziness and pyre.

But like all processes of nation building, each person must admit it’s fault and rebounds on a fresh start, hopefully starting with the commander-in-chief. I know you and other lazy thinkers would object that we can still make progress while keeping the chief executive in place. But this fallacy of pity to appeal to the public, [argumentum ad misericordiam and argumentum ad populum] only makes our national edifice look like a house of cards whose collapse is just a few seconds away from the winds.

There is absolutely no way we can face the outside world without facing ourselves, challenging ourselves and triumphing over ourselves.
In conjunction with the legislative therefore, the creation of a Patriotic Fortress should be established, designed to promote all those actions and individuals invested in the defense of national values/interests and the fight of our enemies thereof.

UNITY: Nationalism between Provincialism, Regionalism and Federalism

During the creation of OHADA, which the initiated of African lawyers in order to promote investment in the whole of Africa, it happened that the most spoken language on the continent was French. According art. 42 of the OHADA, it was stipulated that the working language of the initiative would be French. As a result of this naïve, close minded approach [which was also intimidating], South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana as well as majority of the English Speaking nations decided to pull out from the law. Consequently, we have an OHADA law that is used mainly in French nations excluding the rest – a perfect example of disharmony and lack of foresight, taking advantage of language to undermine other groups.

There is no doubt that the English Cameroon has some specificities attributed to its heritage – culturally, linguistically, legally and academically, and it and these values as the things that constitute their identity. No doubt, the French equally have a style of life which they value and treasure.

The reunification of Feb. 1961 conference or the Foumban Conference instituted the federal republic of Cameroon which was dissolved in 1972 in favor of a greater union. So, the question of a federal republic, which many find strange had been part of our history, which according to our Constitution had been theoretically replaced with regionalism. Here, the details seems misleading since the governors are still appointed and not all the senators are elected by the people. In this light, we find ourselves in a nation which is neither united, not a federal regime, not regional nor provincial but simply a centrifugal scheme control by the center to the glory of their league.

Regionalism had to be enforced through decentralization which in Cameroon is not only a tedious process, but Etoudi has never seized from taking control of the whole structure of administration through direct implication of appointed leaders which have no connection with the people they serve. The disconnection is evident in the resultant frustration that the citizens find themselves in as well as the bypass of existing norms in favor of transported rules commonly practiced in the region.

The riots which have caused so much instability in the nation is nothing unexpected. It is a problem that you and your administration have willfully decided to neglect through despise, negligence and ignorance – a model of governance that has become even more common in most sectors of the country.

Some would argue that since there are tendencies of separation of the French in Canada, the French and the Flemings, the Scottish from Britain or the Biafra from Nigeria, it should not be forgotten that the history of all these nations are different. In the case of Southern Cameroon, we must admit that a strong centralize presidency cannot co-exist with a strong regional/federal system where people have a relative autonomy to decide on their local affairs.

I have no doubt how detached you are from these issues. Having the military and all the arsenal that you need to dominate others without the need to engage in any dialogue seems to be a strategy that works for you – at least for now. While young people are compromising their lives with the hope to make a change, the government has failed to see the care of the problem: the lack of opportunity from those from these regions, the subjugation/elimination of English model in the legal system by judges who never studies it but are assigned in english-speaking zones, the erosion of the English heritage under the pretext of harmonization of the educational curricula.

At a time when the whole world is moving in favor of the English system or a country like Rwanda completely moving away from the French language, Cameroon is instead the contrary. It follows that the residence of Cameroon is in the national territory that we all know but symbolically, France is the domicile of the nation. Why? Because as a people, we have not crafted laws that conform to our realities.

As you should have noticed old friend, your time is limited but the challenges increase. Also, I have not mentioned anything about separation. Why? The tendency to separate is a willingness on the part of the government not to solve any problem and to prove that we as a people are incapable to real justice. It is my belief that we learn our lessons from our past and make the necessary choices that would lead us to a better future which we would be proud of.

As I said earlier, your kids all live in stable nations where there is good education and stable politics. May you do the same in the same country which you govern.
Therefore, the Regional Fairness Authority should be instituted with immediate effect, with representatives from southern Cameroon in order to determine the level of advancement of the nation. It is the weak and the dominated who can determine what is fair and not the dominant.

Diaspora: On Auxiliary Concerns

Diaspora: on auxiliary concerns “Land is not fatherland, the first is structure while the second is structural.” [UGC] In other words, fatherland does not mean land of the father, but everything of heritage from the father – land being just a minimal part of it. It is with the understanding that we can rightfully address the question of those Cameroonians/Africans who live out of their land.

I understand that you have not yet approved Cameroonians of the diaspora to vote during national elections, and we don’t doubt the reasons for such a decision. But there is one thing we must keep in mind. People who live out of the country, although may want to participate in the political life of their country, are simply more interested in a country characterized by the rule of law with good infrastructure, where they can invest and transfer the good things they have learned from other nations. This, in my opinion, is what most people care about, not just the elections as you had erroneously thought.

In other words, by strengthening those internal values, we built a nation where others can be proud of and can share the values thereof with others in the world.
Why is this important? As you can remember, all your children study in foreign countries, including the one in Los Angeles who recently made headlines for her video she posted complaining about racism. Making an economy of this story, we should admit that irrespective of her opulent lifestyle, she is not exempt from being considered a ‘black girl’ from a poor undeveloped nation, like a profiteer in a foreign land after neglecting to fix hers. She enters into the category of all other black people who are seen with prejudice before examination.

This is the land where millions of our people were made to undergo slavery, in its cruelest forms. And why? Because we were divided and some of our leaders didn’t make the right choices of protecting our people. While I fear that a similar scenario might be reproducing itself today with millions of Africans risking their lives to go to Europe or other countries [where they’ll definitely not be held with respect], I however still believe that we can turn this situation round and make our nation a better place for our people.

Because she lives in this stereotypes, her wealth and comfort won’t modify the equation. But this is not a situation of fatality. She’s here because to learn which is what most of us do. What our people undergo can be undone only through a radical change of our place of origin;making Cameroon and Africa a place where happiness and progress triumphs. If this is not possible, our individual successes will be seen only as a manifestation of the graciousness of others on us, which participate in our victimization, down grading and extermination. You now understand why the wealth of your children don’t change the equation. Thymus, which helps in biological growth of individuals [or our personal enrichment] is different from thymos which is the motor of history, making people to achieve great things in life for their people and the world. We need more thymos, not thymus.

Comparing us with other people of the world, we can say that we got no real friends with special exceptions of Cuba. Even the Hindu Ghandi, venerated by the world is known to make the most outrageous racists remarks against blacks in South Africa and fought principally for the respect of Indians with no regards of what happened to the blacks, while his counterpart, Nelson Mandela stood on the side of fairness for all, which sounded no echo of reciprocity on the part of Ghandi. Now, if Ghandhi could be as prejudiced as he was against us, what do we expect from others?

We have come of age, and it’s only right to talk about the things that concern us and see how we move on from here intersection. Therefore, the creation of the Diasporic Province shall be instituted to unite our people and establish their direct implication in the promotion of the cause for our people.
Closing remarks: end of reign and rebirth of a new era “we must keep in mind this historic truth. Day and night we strife to make the world better; day and night the world thinks on how to make us worse. We shall have no rest till we triumph completely in this historic avenue.” UGC.

I don’t envy your throne, perhaps more your daughter but the burden of the current situation of our people and the world continue to weigh tremendously on me, leaving little time for the emotional faculty. I therefore do not shy to announce to you that the end of imminent. Change things or things will change you. In either case, Cameroon needs a revolution; mental, governmental, structural and infrastructural. Of course, there is a difference between reforms and revolution.

The first, which we have always done, consist in an incremental adjustment of policies and behavior; a process which has done us no good. The second, whose advent is near and inevitable, consists in a fundamental shift of governmental scheme which invest fearlessly,as in a war, for the protection of its people through governance, technology, integrity, and progress.

Your days are counted, so too are mine. But there is a difference: while young clinch to life and all its comforts, I had let go of these things a decade ago. A person succeeds by acquiring the things of success or admitting humbly that he has failed in doing so. In your case, you have not acquired the things of success for our people [justice, progress and happiness] and you have deliberately refused to admit that you’ve failed.

This is where your failure becomes not only the absence of progress but a pathological condition where abnormality is being normalized, jeopardizing as a result, the national edifice and corrupting the historic memory of our people especially its youth. Of course, the greatest crime against our people is precisely this normalization of anomality, which at the end, only explains its immoral derivatives as seen rampantly in our society: colle la petite, “on va toujours boire, corruption, nepotism, bigotory etc.

A personal adversary should be treated personally and not as a danger to the State. There’s no need to punish the nation for the wrongs of a few people against you.

By declaring that “a person lasts in power not because he wants but because he can” you exhibit an arrogant and self-congratulatory demeanor of your abilities to despise the institutions of the State through intimidating and decretal rule – all for the benefit of one individual: yourself.

The injury made to the State and our generation is immense but the wound left in the memory of history is both immeasurable and perpetual.
As mentioned in the preamble of this note, the values we learned while in the seminary is still in us, and I believe that you still have the conscience to know that it is wrong to let poverty and injustice triumph in an environment where difference can be made. While I think that you can make this change happen, time is simply running against you and nature must have limited your vigor and rigor in making this happen due to your advanced age.

It is therefore only right, as nature requires, that you get some rest, while instituting the recommended agencies as a matter of urgency. It is time to reconcile with the nation, by leaving on a positive note. Our friend Goodluck Jonathan, after being a mediocre president, made alasting impression on the world and Africa by leaving office peacefully and ensuring a peaceful transition.

There are good examples to emulate. Our friend of Tanzania, president John Magufuli, took only three months to change the country, making great progress in a short span of time. In 33 years, absolutely nothing has been achieved and it is not in your advanced age that a difference would be made. Don’t tell me that you constructed a few kilometers road! No. Most of these are not roads. They are strips of vehicle paths which would not stand the test of time, weather and use.

There is no reason why we don’t have a 14 lane road from yaounde to Douala, connecting these vital cities.

Reading the Prince will teach you how to protect yourself, and definitely create more insecurity; but reading Zun Tsu will enable you protect all citizens including the prince, in his temporality. And the reason is simple, the State is always in permanent war, waged through diplomacy and commerce. This is not a fight for you and I and our children. It is a battle for all our people and our race – which we believe has come of age and must be redeemed from its abyss to the light of the day.

It is time for our democratic nausea, our economic hemorrhage, administrative paralysis and technological epilepsy to come to an end; and may the advent of respect, governance, hard work, innovation and creation lead the way for the new
Let the new era begin, the android era, the post-modern digital era characterized by governance, rule of law, investments and progress.
Long live the World Governance Board,
Long live the android generation,
Long live the enduring people of the republic of Cameroon
Long live a thriving Africa and all its people of the diaspora.

History can only be delayed; it always accomplishes itself.

1. The time has come when there shall be no more coup d’Etat nor perpetual rulers; for there shall be one State, one people and one abiding just law.
2. The time has come when our children would no longer be stewards or objects for others but rejoice freely in the prosperity of their land, sharing dignity and majesty that is theirs.
3. The time has come when our young, strong and brilliant brains would not longer die in foreign waters or alien jails seeking asylum, better lives or education; for there shall flourish knowledge, personal growth and common welfare.
4. The time has come when those who market us with the stigma of war, division, selfishness, diseases, ignorance and poverty would decline; for in this land they shall seek and find peace, security, unity, charity, health and true knowledge.
5. The time has come when our leaders would be ashamed to go abroad, nor hide stolen money or shamelessly bag; but rejoice in the blessing of their land, and invest daringly for its progress and prosperity.
6. The time has come when it shall no longer be a question of tribe, clan or ethnic grouping, but of justice, intelligence, hard work and competence.
7. The time has come when the world would no longer be ‘there’ where we strive to belong, for it shall be ‘right here’ where everyone would strive to belong.
8. The time has come when false prophets of pessimism, erring advisers and unskillful agents would be dissipated, for there shall arise hope, competence, growth, justice and the promise would be fulfilled.
9. The time has come when we shall no longer be beggars, borrowers, sub-agents and gatecrashers in the banquet of the world; for we shall be givers, lenders, the gateway and real stakeholders.
10. The time has come when these resources would no longer be given out in exchange for used made goods; for they shall be products at the service of our own goods and progress.
11. The time has come when the market and money shall no longer be ‘there’ but shall be ‘here’ and ‘here’; for we must have known that we are capable of going and being what we have desired.

History can only delay; it always accomplishes itself.

 

Donald Trump Wears A Hard Hat: Get Ready to Move…Again, by Dr. Steven Nur Ahmed

 

A report by Reuters on December 19, 2016, written by M.B. Bell and Joshua Schneyer, identified thousands of areas across the United States where lead poisoning is worse than it is in Flint, Michigan: “A Reuter examination of lead testing results across the country found almost 3000 areas with poisoning rates far higher than in the tainted Michigan City.” Reuters stopped their count at 3000. There are thousands more.

For over 100 years, scientists and scholars have known of the deleterious effects of lead poisoning on the human body particularly the brain in young and old persons. But we will not rehash the scientific findings of the specific effects of lead poisoning in this article. Nor shall we examine the criminal proceedings now in process against those responsible for the lead poisoning disaster in Flint, Michigan. Those subjects are not the main point I want to make here because there is another crisis looming on the horizon and it will be a collateral effect of lead testing results across the nation.

A demographic crisis is forming. It will displace millions of Descendants of Slaves out of inner cities across the United States. The crisis will put gentrification into hyper-drive and there will be no stopping it from happening because there are no credible reasons to make the argument that it would not be legal nor is there a persuasive moral argument that it should not happen.

Bell and Schneyer identified Flint, Michigan; we can add to that Detroit; Chicago, Illinois. They also identified the city of Baltimore, Maryland; Missouri;  Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Cleveland, Ohio; Philadelphia and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; South Bend, Indiana. But there are thousands more cities across the nation wherein children and adults suffer brain damage due to lead poisoning.  

Let me put it another way, it will be the great migration in reverse. But this time with no hope of a higher quality of life in an industrial urban setting with plenty of blue collar and domestic jobs.[1] What is going to happen may or may not be more pressing because of Donald Trump’s election to be our 45th President of the United States.

It is not a Republican nor Democratic nor Libertarian scheme, for the political bosses are but emissaries; rather, it is a corporate scheme to turn leaded inner city infrastructures into healthy and vibrant life centers with plush recreational parks for the power elite.

Donald Trump will become the President of the United States on January 20, 2017. He is uniquely qualified to carry the corporate ball down field and to make their plan a reality because his expertise is in the field of building construction and eminent domain. When they see an opening in the line, corporate America crashes everything and moves the ball through it.They will be awarded billions of tax payer dollars by getting government contracts. They will for the most part be white owned companies. 

That begs the question: what will be the rational used to trigger the crisis? My answer is that it will be based upon ‘condemnation policy’ for public health and safety purposes. It will be legal. Lead infested infrastructures are a cause for public health and safety action by local, state, and federal governments. The U.S. Constitution gives governments the legal authority to have such policy.

The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides for the legal acquisition of private property under what is called ‘eminent domain’. Therein it states: “…nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

What that means is that governments have a legal duty. Governments must provide due process of law to the property owner. Governments must serve a legal or natural person who owns the property a notice of the date and place a court proceeding is to take place. They must cite the law upon which such a notice is based. Governments must make it clear that their aim is to take away the property of the holder of title. Governments must provide for such a private owner a day in court to argue why the government has no legal or rational basis to take their property.

Secondly, if a government takes a private property then it must pay the owner fair market value for that property. Then and only then can a government legally take private property for public use or purposes.

Supreme Court decisions have expanded the limits of governments’ right to seize private property from owners. Those decisions are of vital importance to us because they will enable us to see the corporate strategy or play book for taking lead infested environments and booting out descendants of slaves.

The problem that Descendants of Slaves have in relation to eminent domain is more complex now than ever before. Keep this in mind, most Descendants of Slaves who live within inner cities where lead is a public health and safety issue…do not own the property wherein they live. That means that: 1. No notice will be given to them of court proceedings to take property; they will usually get 30 to 60 days to move, and 2. though the owners will get fair market value compensation from government, the fact is that most Descendants of Slaves will get no compensation whatsoever. With little or no money and priced out of high rent neighborhoods, most Descendants of Slaves will have nowhere to go.[2] New Supreme Court decisions now make all of this not just possible but highly likely.

In Kelo v. City of New London,[3] 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the Supreme Court of the United States held that  the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development is constitutional: “In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that the general benefits a community enjoyed from economic growth qualified private redevelopment plans as a permissible “public use” under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.” That decision made ‘public use takings’ synonymous with ‘public purpose’. The court privatized the 5th amendment takings clause.  If a company can prove that it plans the broad and vague phrase ‘public purpose’ to a court, then it can legally take private property and remarket it for profit.

The test employed under Kelo v. City of New London is a simple one: “…if an economic project creates new jobs, increases taxes and other revenues, and revitalizes a depressed (even if not blighted) urban area, it qualifies as a public use.” Justice Stevens wrote in that decision: “the Court long ago rejected any literal requirement that condemned property be put into use for the general public”[4] The foundation has been laid. Cities across the nation will take advantage of this diction to attract a wealthier population while pushing out poor whites and descendants of slaves.

There will be many other collateral effects. Some will be beneficial. For example, there will be a steep decline in black on black homicide and violent crime. There will be a steep decline in the number of Descendants of Slaves incarcerated. There will be a steep decline in the number children who are exposed to lead and other heavy metal toxins. Just to name a few.

Some of the harmful collateral effects will be increased poverty among descendants of slaves; few jobs which provide a livable wage; greater spatial difficulty accessing vocational and college institutions; the end of national grass root social justice organizations which depend upon a concentrated population of Descendants of Slaves for support; social alienation among poor and wealthy Descendants of Slaves; drug abuse will increase; fertility rates will decrease even lower than now; the marriage rate will continue to decline and will become the lowest in the nation; the traditional ‘black church’ will wither away.

The black church will be replaced by ecumenical churches which abandon Descendants of Slaves primarily because they are generally poor. Instead they will reach out to non-descendants of slaves as the religious priests struggle to keep their revenue streams fluid; and lastly, there will be an increase in more psychopathic individuals making claims to you on social media that you should give them your money.[5]

The fabric and texture of the lives of Descendants of Slaves in America is about to undergo such a radical change that many will suffer what the sociologist Emile Durkheim described as ‘anomie’. Consequently, suicide rates among Descendants of Slaves will rise significantly over the next 10 years.

Adding to the overall post-modern disenfranchisement of Descendants of Slaves is new technology. New technologies such as Nano technology, Bio- technology, Robotic technology or artificial intelligence, and an increasing demand for brain driven workers has made most Descendants of Slaves literally obsolete.    

Great play writers know that there are only three ideal types in drama. One is comedy. One is tragedy. And one is a combination of both called…tragicomedy. Descendants of Slaves have no doubt played all three of these types for three centuries and continue to do so. 

But all plays must inevitably come to an end. So, now, the curtain draws slowly on this one, too. I know you want to hear something good, something positive for the new year. You want to see fireworks; sparklers and such. But I’m not going to lie to you. I don’t want your money because I know what true wealth is; and I don’t need you to be up in my face crowd pleasing me.  So, I don’t need to sugar coat what I say to you.  It will be an unhappy new year for Descendants of Slaves.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] The Great Migration was the movement of 6 million African-Americans out of the rural Southern United States to the urban Northeast, Midwest, and West that occurred between 1910 and 1970. Wikipedia

[2] Section 8 housing will place many of them far out into the suburbs.

[3] 545 U.S. 469 (2005)

[4] 545 U.S. 469

[5] This can already be seen on Go Fund Me cites as well as You-tube, Facebook, et al.

WILL MILLENNIALS LOSE NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY? by Dr. Steven Nur Ahmed

Millenials 2

There is both a national and international plan underfoot. It is being carried out by the power elite. Their goal is to take away judicial jurisdiction out of the hands of the millennial generation as well as all future generations of U.S. citizens.The power elite are carrying out their plan in order to preserve wealth and power on a transnational level in their hands and the hands of their descendants.

Their immediate purpose is to subordinate Federal and State judicial jurisdiction defined by the United States Constitution under Article 3 as well as the 10th amendment.   That would put our highest courts under a new special global corporate legal jurisdiction called the ‘Investors State Dispute Settlements Court’. The consequence is that corporations through the court would then be enabled to sue nations for their projected corporate losses of ‘expected future monetary profits’. 

That new legal system called the ‘Investors State Dispute Settlement’ court is designed to dominate both Federal and State courts in matters relating to foreign corporate interests in the United States and throughout the pacific rim. That system would make U.S. citizens pay billions of dollars in fines if they pass laws to protect U.S. interests which conflict with and interfere with foreign corporate profits.

The plan is called the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement. If it is signed into law by the next President of the United States, it will signal the first step to an end of United States Sovereign power and the beginning of direct multinational corporate control over the U.S. military, forever. 

It is an agreement made by the 1% to 10% of power elites defined by Forbes 400 Magazine in 2015, the 40 pacific rim nation prospective signatories, multinational corporations, Wall Street, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and International Bank of Settlements. They all want the aggreement to be signed by President Barak Obama. He wants to sign it, too. He works for them.

Those parties and institutions want our Congress and the President to make the TPP agreement binding with no sunset clause in it. They want that because such a law will take away not only judicial jurisdiction over companies and nations doing business in the the United States but also to take away their right to bear arms which the power elite perceive to be a great threat to their growing power in the United States.

They want to limit legal jurisdiction of Federal and State courts, and they want total control over the U.S. military and the industries which support it.  In short, they want absolute power because the national political winds are no longer blowing in their favor. They can feel it pressing against their faces. 

They see before their eyes a political turn that is occurring and have marked it as a hinge period in U.S. political history. A period which has the potential to irreversibly change the course of world history against their interests.

They know that there will be no going back to the days when they could work in the shadows. They know that they must act now and they plan to do so under a Presidency of either Obama, Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump. For they see demographic, economic, and state and federal voting patterns are now threatening their power. 

Millennials pass Baby Boomers

The Millennials are making their political and economic frustrations and anger known to the world. The millennials are defined as those born between 1981 to those reaching the age of 18 years of age in 2016. In 2015, the millennial generation population is over 70 million; it has surpassed the baby boom population which numbered over 60 million persons born between 1945 and 1964.[1] Their postmodern political preferences are now being felt. Old political boundaries mean nothing to them; justice, the environment, and their future means everything to them.

During the recent democratic party nomination process, the effect of postmodern millennial culture was a political quake. More than 80% of all votes for democratic party socialist Bernie Sanders were cast by millennials. It was a clear statement of their collective sentiment for social change. For them, the prospect of Hillary Clinton becoming president of the United States is cause for them to have high anxiety and for good reasons.

Hillary Clinton is unalterably tied to and personally loyal to Wall Street financial interests. Millennials know that her husband Bill Clinton signed into law the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act of 1933 which set in motion the economic collapse of 2008. They know Bill Clinton signed into law the welfare reformation act. They know that Bill Clinton signed into law N.A.F.T.A. All at the behest of Wall Street and corporate interests. They know it has cost them uncounted thousands of jobs. They know that it was Bill and Hillary Clinton who signed into law outrageous prison sentences for petty non-violent drug offenders.  They know that Hillary Clinton is duplicitous by design.

Millennials know that the Clinton Foundation has clear international conflicts of interests ranging from deals with shady individuals, foreign corporations to nation states such as Saudi Arabia. All of that underscores to millennials that there will be no respite from their lives of debt. Even now, 31% of all Federal assets are student loans over 1.2 trillion dollars.[2] The Federal Government has become dependent on students remaining in financial debt for student loans for life.

Fasces

Millennials know that they are being slowly enclosed within the walls of a new kind of color blind global slave plantation. A plantation system which approximates the Roman Empire more than any other since ancient Rome. They know what that means for them. The ‘Fasces’ will be carried by a new global legal system with a mercenary global military to back it up. Millennials know that if they do not act now they will not have the freedom to act in the near future.

Millions of millennials are and will continue to be under employed at low paying jobs in the service sector economy and forced to live at home with their parents well into their 30s with no change in sight. They have therefore beaten a new path.

Millennials have sought an anti-neo-liberal and Republican path because they have no confidence in the political status quo. That has led the power elite to political panic and mayhem on the streets of America. For the first time in over 100 years we are seeing a democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, supported by both a fractured and corrupt democratic party combined with corrupt republicans. Republicans who have abandoned the GOP because a national revolt by disenfranchised grass root ‘white’ Americans have gutted the Republican Party.  

New political sentiments driven by a new born national conscience are threatening to redistribute the wealth of the power elite and restructure its armed guard…the sheriffs’ and police departments. Thus, the TPP is an instrument for the elite to maintain their wealth and power.

The TPP has an ultimate aim. Their aim is to take away Federal and State judicial jurisdiction over corporations in the TPP from all future generations of the U.S regardless of race and gender. They aim to do that because they know that if they don’t take away Federal and State judicial jurisdition over the TPP then any law passed in their favor under either Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump will be repealed after one or the other leaves office. They know they have lost control over the two party system; thus they will be less able to manipulate nominees to power. The power elite know that a whole new political order is on the horizon. They are running frenzied at the mere thought of it.

Non white outnumber whites

The power elite face yet another problem looming on the horizon. It was reported by the Pew Research Center in June of 2016 that: “The bureau’s (Census Bureau) estimates for July 1, 2015, released today, say that just over half – 50.2% – of U.S. babies younger than 1-year-old were racial or ethnic minorities. In sheer numbers, there were 1,995,102 minority babies compared with 1,982,936 non-Hispanic white infants, according to the census estimates.”[3] Assuming conditions remain more or less the same, a higher birth rate of racial minority infants will continue resulting in a majority non-white U.S. population.

The days when the fallacious racial strategy of ‘appeal to the silent majority’ to garner votes are over. So now the power elite have a big problem because most of the wealth in the United States and the world is concentrated in the hands of a small group of about 10% of the white population. They can no longer rely on old majority numbers.

So what of the United State military? What role will it play? There has already been a corporate coup d’etat of the U.S. military. For example, it was reported by ‘Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics’ in Washington D.C. and ‘the Brave New Foundation’ that “…70% of retired three and four star generals took jobs with defense contractors or consultants.”[4]

That fact demonstrates that the U.S. military has been for over 100 years infiltrated by Wall Street and corporate money. Money and the manufacturers of war materials actually control the military just as police and sheriffs’ departments across the nation control city politicians when it is in their interests to do so.

The cooptation of the United States military by TPP courts will give TPP the global muscle to enforce its corporate legal jurisdiction as the military has done for domestic corporations since its inception.[5]

Finally, for the power elite, U.S. citizens must be disarmed. If Hillary Clinton is elected she will appoint a Supreme Court Justice or justices who will swing court voting in that direction. It will give the court a majority vote in some obscure case which makes its way up the court system. The Second Amendment will be so watered down that over time only shot guns will be lawful in one’s home.

The de facto repeal of the second amendment to the United States Constitution is viewed by the power elite as necessary. They see it as necessary because the power elite fear an armed citizenry and know it cannot be subordinated to tyranny whether that tyranny is foreign or domestic. If and when the above plans come to fruition it will be the end of the United States of America as a sovereign nation.

The Millennials and every generation which follows after them will lose their constitutional power to reverse decisions made by the Investors State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) court if they are not proactive in changing the political status quo.  

 

 

 

[1] Millennials Overtake Baby Boomers as America’s Largest Generation, Pew Research, 25 April 2016

[2] The Fed’s Financial Accounts: What is Uncle Sam’s Largest Asset? By Jill Mislinski, June 13, 2016

[3] It’s official: Minority babies are the majority among the nation’s infants, but only just…” by D’vera Cohen, June 23, 2016, Pew Research Center

[4] Report: 70 Percent of Retired Generals Took Jobs with Defense Contractors or Consultants, by Luke Johnson, Huffington Post, Nov. 20, 2012

[5] War is a Racket, by Smedly Butler

WHY I WON’T VOTE, by Dr. W.E.B. Dubois, The Nation, 20 October 1956

Dubois 2

On October 20, 1956, W. E. B. Du Bois delivers this eloquent indictment of US politics while explaining to Nation readers why he won’t vote in the upcoming Presidential election. Du Bois condemns both Democrats and Republicans for their indifferent positions on the influence of corporate wealth, racial inequality, arms proliferation and unaffordable health care.

Since I was twenty-one in 1889, I have in theory followed the voting plan strongly advocated by Sidney Lens in The Nation of August 4, i.e., voting for a third party even when its chances were hopeless, if the main parties were unsatisfactory; or, in absence of a third choice, voting for the lesser of two evils. My action, however, had to be limited by the candidates’ attitude toward Negroes. Of my adult life, I have spent twenty-three years living and teaching in the South, where my voting choice was not asked. I was disfranchised by law or administration. In the North I lived in all thirty-two years, covering eight Presidential elections. In 1912 I wanted to support Theodore Roosevelt, but his Bull Moose convention dodged the Negro problem and I tried to help elect Wilson as a liberal Southerner. Under Wilson came the worst attempt at Jim Crow legislation and discrimination in civil service that we had experienced since the Civil War. In 1916 I took Hughes as the lesser of two evils. He promised Negroes nothing and kept his word. In 1920, I supported Harding because of his promise to liberate Haiti. In 1924, I voted for La Follette, although I knew he could not be elected. In 1928, Negroes faced absolute dilemma. Neither Hoover nor Smith wanted the Negro vote and both publicly insulted us. I voted for Norman Thomas and the Socialists, although the Socialists had attempted to Jim Crow Negro members in the South. In 1932 I voted for Franklin Roosevelt, since Hoover was unthinkable and Roosevelt’s attitude toward workers most realistic. I was again in the South from 1934 until 1944. Technically I could vote, but the election in which I could vote was a farce. The real election was the White Primary.

Retired “for age” in 1944, I returned to the North and found a party to my liking. In 1948, I voted the Progressive ticket for Henry Wallace and in 1952 for Vincent Hallinan.

In 1956, I shall not go to the polls. I have not registered. I believe that democracy has so far disappeared in the United States that no “two evils” exist. There is but one evil party with two names, and it will be elected despite all I can do or say. There is no third party. On the Presidential ballot in a few states (seventeen in 1952), a “Socialist” Party will appear. Few will hear its appeal because it will have almost no opportunity to take part in the campaign and explain its platform. If a voter organizes or advocates a real third-party movement, he may be accused of seeking to overthrow this government by “force and violence.” Anything he advocates by way of significant reform will be called “Communist” and will of necessity be Communist in the sense that it must advocate such things as government ownership of the means of production; government in business; the limitation of private profit; social medicine, government housing and federal aid to education; the total abolition of race bias; and the welfare state. These things are on every Communist program; these things are the aim of socialism. Any American who advocates them today, no matter how sincerely, stands in danger of losing his job, surrendering his social status and perhaps landing in jail. The witnesses against him may be liars or insane or criminals. These witnesses need give no proof for their charges and may not even be known or appear in person. They may be in the pay of the United States Government. A.D.A.’s and “Liberals” are not third parties; they seek to act as tails to kites. But since the kites are self-propelled and radar-controlled, tails are quite superfluous and rather silly.

The present Administration is carrying on the greatest preparation for war in the history of mankind. Stevenson promises to maintain or increase this effort. The weight of our taxation is unbearable and rests mainly and deliberately on the poor. This Administration is dominated and directed by wealth and for the accumulation of wealth. It runs smoothly like a well-organized industry and should do so because industry runs it for the benefit of industry. Corporate wealth profits as never before in history. We turn over the national resources to private profit and have few funds left for education, health or housing. Our crime, especially juvenile crime, is increasing. Its increase is perfectly logical; for a generation we have been teaching our youth to kill, destroy, steal and rape in war; what can we expect in peace? We let men take wealth which is not theirs; if the seizure is “legal” we call it high profits and the profiteers help decide what is legal. If the theft is “illegal” the thief can fight it out in court, with excellent chances to win if he receives the accolade of the right newspapers. Gambling in home, church and on the stock market is increasing and all prices are rising. It costs three times his salary to elect a Senator and many millions to elect a President. This money comes from the very corporations which today are the government. This in a real democracy would be enough to turn the party responsible out of power. Yet this we cannot do.

The “other” party has surrendered all party differences in foreign affairs, and foreign affairs are our most important affairs today and take most of our taxes. Even in domestic affairs how does Stevenson differ from Eisenhower? He uses better English than Dulles, thank God! He has a sly humor, where Eisenhower has none. Beyond this Stevenson stands on the race question in the South not far from where his godfather Adlai stood sixty-three years ago, which reconciles him to the South. He has no clear policy on war or preparation for war; on water and flood control; on reduction of taxation; on the welfare state. He wavers on civil rights and his party blocked civil rights in the Senate until Douglas of Illinois admitted that the Democratic Senate would and could stop even the right of Senators to vote. Douglas had a right to complain. Three million voters sent him to the Senate to speak for them. His voice was drowned and his vote nullified by Eastland, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who was elected by 151,000 voters. This is the democracy in the United States which we peddle abroad.

Negroes hope to muster 400,000 votes in 1956. Where will they cast them? What have the Republicans done to enforce the education decision of the Supreme Court? What they advertised as fair employment was exactly nothing, and Nixon was just the man to explain it. What has the Administration done to rescue Negro workers, the most impoverished group in the nation, half of whom receive less than half the median wage of the nation, while the nation sends billions abroad to protect oil investments and help employ slave labor in the Union of South Africa and the Rhodesias? Very well, and will the party of Talmadge, Eastland and Ellender do better than the Republicans if the Negroes return them to office?

I have no advice for others in this election. Are you voting Democratic? Well and good; all I ask is why? Are you voting for Eisenhower and his smooth team of bright ghost writers? Again, why? Will your helpless vote either way support or restore democracy to America?

Is the refusal to vote in this phony election a counsel of despair? No, it is dogged hope. It is hope that if twenty-five million voters refrain from voting in 1956 because of their own accord and not because of a sly wink from Khrushchev, this might make the American people ask how much longer this dumb farce can proceed without even a whimper of protest. Yet if we protest, off the nation goes to Russia and China. Fifty-five American ministers and philanthropists are asking the Soviet Union “to face manfully the doubts and promptings of their conscience.” Can not these do-gooders face their own consciences? Can they not see that American culture is rotting away: our honesty, our human sympathy; our literature, save what we import from abroad? Our only “review” of literature has wisely dropped “literature” from its name. Our manners are gone and the one thing we want is to be rich–to show off. Success is measured by income. University education is for income, not culture, and is partially supported by private industry. We are not training poets or musicians, but atomic engineers. Business is built on successful lying called advertising. We want money in vast amount, no matter how we get it. So we have it, and what then?

Is the answer the election of 1956? We can make a sick man President and set him to a job which would strain a man in robust health. So he dies, and what do we get to lead us? With Stevenson and Nixon, with Eisenhower and Eastland, we remain in the same mess. I will be no party to it and that will make little difference. You will take large part and bravely march to the polls, and that also will make no difference. Stop running Russia and giving Chinese advice when we cannot rule ourselves decently. Stop yelling about a democracy we do not have. Democracy is dead in the United States. Yet there is still nothing to replace real democracy. Drop the chains, then, that bind our brains. Drive the money-changers from the seats of the Cabinet and the halls of Congress. Call back some faint spirit of Jefferson and Lincoln, and when again we can hold a fair election on real issues, let’s vote, and not till then. Is this impossible? Then democracy in America is impossible.