Millenials 2

There is both a national and international plan underfoot. It is being carried out by the power elite. Their goal is to take away judicial jurisdiction out of the hands of the millennial generation as well as all future generations of U.S. citizens.The power elite are carrying out their plan in order to preserve wealth and power on a transnational level in their hands and the hands of their descendants.

Their immediate purpose is to subordinate Federal and State judicial jurisdiction defined by the United States Constitution under Article 3 as well as the 10th amendment.   That would put our highest courts under a new special global corporate legal jurisdiction called the ‘Investors State Dispute Settlements Court’. The consequence is that corporations through the court would then be enabled to sue nations for their projected corporate losses of ‘expected future monetary profits’. 

That new legal system called the ‘Investors State Dispute Settlement’ court is designed to dominate both Federal and State courts in matters relating to foreign corporate interests in the United States and throughout the pacific rim. That system would make U.S. citizens pay billions of dollars in fines if they pass laws to protect U.S. interests which conflict with and interfere with foreign corporate profits.

The plan is called the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement. If it is signed into law by the next President of the United States, it will signal the first step to an end of United States Sovereign power and the beginning of direct multinational corporate control over the U.S. military, forever. 

It is an agreement made by the 1% to 10% of power elites defined by Forbes 400 Magazine in 2015, the 40 pacific rim nation prospective signatories, multinational corporations, Wall Street, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and International Bank of Settlements. They all want the aggreement to be signed by President Barak Obama. He wants to sign it, too. He works for them.

Those parties and institutions want our Congress and the President to make the TPP agreement binding with no sunset clause in it. They want that because such a law will take away not only judicial jurisdiction over companies and nations doing business in the the United States but also to take away their right to bear arms which the power elite perceive to be a great threat to their growing power in the United States.

They want to limit legal jurisdiction of Federal and State courts, and they want total control over the U.S. military and the industries which support it.  In short, they want absolute power because the national political winds are no longer blowing in their favor. They can feel it pressing against their faces. 

They see before their eyes a political turn that is occurring and have marked it as a hinge period in U.S. political history. A period which has the potential to irreversibly change the course of world history against their interests.

They know that there will be no going back to the days when they could work in the shadows. They know that they must act now and they plan to do so under a Presidency of either Obama, Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump. For they see demographic, economic, and state and federal voting patterns are now threatening their power. 

Millennials pass Baby Boomers

The Millennials are making their political and economic frustrations and anger known to the world. The millennials are defined as those born between 1981 to those reaching the age of 18 years of age in 2016. In 2015, the millennial generation population is over 70 million; it has surpassed the baby boom population which numbered over 60 million persons born between 1945 and 1964.[1] Their postmodern political preferences are now being felt. Old political boundaries mean nothing to them; justice, the environment, and their future means everything to them.

During the recent democratic party nomination process, the effect of postmodern millennial culture was a political quake. More than 80% of all votes for democratic party socialist Bernie Sanders were cast by millennials. It was a clear statement of their collective sentiment for social change. For them, the prospect of Hillary Clinton becoming president of the United States is cause for them to have high anxiety and for good reasons.

Hillary Clinton is unalterably tied to and personally loyal to Wall Street financial interests. Millennials know that her husband Bill Clinton signed into law the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act of 1933 which set in motion the economic collapse of 2008. They know Bill Clinton signed into law the welfare reformation act. They know that Bill Clinton signed into law N.A.F.T.A. All at the behest of Wall Street and corporate interests. They know it has cost them uncounted thousands of jobs. They know that it was Bill and Hillary Clinton who signed into law outrageous prison sentences for petty non-violent drug offenders.  They know that Hillary Clinton is duplicitous by design.

Millennials know that the Clinton Foundation has clear international conflicts of interests ranging from deals with shady individuals, foreign corporations to nation states such as Saudi Arabia. All of that underscores to millennials that there will be no respite from their lives of debt. Even now, 31% of all Federal assets are student loans over 1.2 trillion dollars.[2] The Federal Government has become dependent on students remaining in financial debt for student loans for life.


Millennials know that they are being slowly enclosed within the walls of a new kind of color blind global slave plantation. A plantation system which approximates the Roman Empire more than any other since ancient Rome. They know what that means for them. The ‘Fasces’ will be carried by a new global legal system with a mercenary global military to back it up. Millennials know that if they do not act now they will not have the freedom to act in the near future.

Millions of millennials are and will continue to be under employed at low paying jobs in the service sector economy and forced to live at home with their parents well into their 30s with no change in sight. They have therefore beaten a new path.

Millennials have sought an anti-neo-liberal and Republican path because they have no confidence in the political status quo. That has led the power elite to political panic and mayhem on the streets of America. For the first time in over 100 years we are seeing a democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, supported by both a fractured and corrupt democratic party combined with corrupt republicans. Republicans who have abandoned the GOP because a national revolt by disenfranchised grass root ‘white’ Americans have gutted the Republican Party.  

New political sentiments driven by a new born national conscience are threatening to redistribute the wealth of the power elite and restructure its armed guard…the sheriffs’ and police departments. Thus, the TPP is an instrument for the elite to maintain their wealth and power.

The TPP has an ultimate aim. Their aim is to take away Federal and State judicial jurisdiction over corporations in the TPP from all future generations of the U.S regardless of race and gender. They aim to do that because they know that if they don’t take away Federal and State judicial jurisdition over the TPP then any law passed in their favor under either Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump will be repealed after one or the other leaves office. They know they have lost control over the two party system; thus they will be less able to manipulate nominees to power. The power elite know that a whole new political order is on the horizon. They are running frenzied at the mere thought of it.

Non white outnumber whites

The power elite face yet another problem looming on the horizon. It was reported by the Pew Research Center in June of 2016 that: “The bureau’s (Census Bureau) estimates for July 1, 2015, released today, say that just over half – 50.2% – of U.S. babies younger than 1-year-old were racial or ethnic minorities. In sheer numbers, there were 1,995,102 minority babies compared with 1,982,936 non-Hispanic white infants, according to the census estimates.”[3] Assuming conditions remain more or less the same, a higher birth rate of racial minority infants will continue resulting in a majority non-white U.S. population.

The days when the fallacious racial strategy of ‘appeal to the silent majority’ to garner votes are over. So now the power elite have a big problem because most of the wealth in the United States and the world is concentrated in the hands of a small group of about 10% of the white population. They can no longer rely on old majority numbers.

So what of the United State military? What role will it play? There has already been a corporate coup d’etat of the U.S. military. For example, it was reported by ‘Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics’ in Washington D.C. and ‘the Brave New Foundation’ that “…70% of retired three and four star generals took jobs with defense contractors or consultants.”[4]

That fact demonstrates that the U.S. military has been for over 100 years infiltrated by Wall Street and corporate money. Money and the manufacturers of war materials actually control the military just as police and sheriffs’ departments across the nation control city politicians when it is in their interests to do so.

The cooptation of the United States military by TPP courts will give TPP the global muscle to enforce its corporate legal jurisdiction as the military has done for domestic corporations since its inception.[5]

Finally, for the power elite, U.S. citizens must be disarmed. If Hillary Clinton is elected she will appoint a Supreme Court Justice or justices who will swing court voting in that direction. It will give the court a majority vote in some obscure case which makes its way up the court system. The Second Amendment will be so watered down that over time only shot guns will be lawful in one’s home.

The de facto repeal of the second amendment to the United States Constitution is viewed by the power elite as necessary. They see it as necessary because the power elite fear an armed citizenry and know it cannot be subordinated to tyranny whether that tyranny is foreign or domestic. If and when the above plans come to fruition it will be the end of the United States of America as a sovereign nation.

The Millennials and every generation which follows after them will lose their constitutional power to reverse decisions made by the Investors State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) court if they are not proactive in changing the political status quo.  




[1] Millennials Overtake Baby Boomers as America’s Largest Generation, Pew Research, 25 April 2016

[2] The Fed’s Financial Accounts: What is Uncle Sam’s Largest Asset? By Jill Mislinski, June 13, 2016

[3] It’s official: Minority babies are the majority among the nation’s infants, but only just…” by D’vera Cohen, June 23, 2016, Pew Research Center

[4] Report: 70 Percent of Retired Generals Took Jobs with Defense Contractors or Consultants, by Luke Johnson, Huffington Post, Nov. 20, 2012

[5] War is a Racket, by Smedly Butler

WHY I WON’T VOTE, by Dr. W.E.B. Dubois, The Nation, 20 October 1956

Dubois 2

On October 20, 1956, W. E. B. Du Bois delivers this eloquent indictment of US politics while explaining to Nation readers why he won’t vote in the upcoming Presidential election. Du Bois condemns both Democrats and Republicans for their indifferent positions on the influence of corporate wealth, racial inequality, arms proliferation and unaffordable health care.

Since I was twenty-one in 1889, I have in theory followed the voting plan strongly advocated by Sidney Lens in The Nation of August 4, i.e., voting for a third party even when its chances were hopeless, if the main parties were unsatisfactory; or, in absence of a third choice, voting for the lesser of two evils. My action, however, had to be limited by the candidates’ attitude toward Negroes. Of my adult life, I have spent twenty-three years living and teaching in the South, where my voting choice was not asked. I was disfranchised by law or administration. In the North I lived in all thirty-two years, covering eight Presidential elections. In 1912 I wanted to support Theodore Roosevelt, but his Bull Moose convention dodged the Negro problem and I tried to help elect Wilson as a liberal Southerner. Under Wilson came the worst attempt at Jim Crow legislation and discrimination in civil service that we had experienced since the Civil War. In 1916 I took Hughes as the lesser of two evils. He promised Negroes nothing and kept his word. In 1920, I supported Harding because of his promise to liberate Haiti. In 1924, I voted for La Follette, although I knew he could not be elected. In 1928, Negroes faced absolute dilemma. Neither Hoover nor Smith wanted the Negro vote and both publicly insulted us. I voted for Norman Thomas and the Socialists, although the Socialists had attempted to Jim Crow Negro members in the South. In 1932 I voted for Franklin Roosevelt, since Hoover was unthinkable and Roosevelt’s attitude toward workers most realistic. I was again in the South from 1934 until 1944. Technically I could vote, but the election in which I could vote was a farce. The real election was the White Primary.

Retired “for age” in 1944, I returned to the North and found a party to my liking. In 1948, I voted the Progressive ticket for Henry Wallace and in 1952 for Vincent Hallinan.

In 1956, I shall not go to the polls. I have not registered. I believe that democracy has so far disappeared in the United States that no “two evils” exist. There is but one evil party with two names, and it will be elected despite all I can do or say. There is no third party. On the Presidential ballot in a few states (seventeen in 1952), a “Socialist” Party will appear. Few will hear its appeal because it will have almost no opportunity to take part in the campaign and explain its platform. If a voter organizes or advocates a real third-party movement, he may be accused of seeking to overthrow this government by “force and violence.” Anything he advocates by way of significant reform will be called “Communist” and will of necessity be Communist in the sense that it must advocate such things as government ownership of the means of production; government in business; the limitation of private profit; social medicine, government housing and federal aid to education; the total abolition of race bias; and the welfare state. These things are on every Communist program; these things are the aim of socialism. Any American who advocates them today, no matter how sincerely, stands in danger of losing his job, surrendering his social status and perhaps landing in jail. The witnesses against him may be liars or insane or criminals. These witnesses need give no proof for their charges and may not even be known or appear in person. They may be in the pay of the United States Government. A.D.A.’s and “Liberals” are not third parties; they seek to act as tails to kites. But since the kites are self-propelled and radar-controlled, tails are quite superfluous and rather silly.

The present Administration is carrying on the greatest preparation for war in the history of mankind. Stevenson promises to maintain or increase this effort. The weight of our taxation is unbearable and rests mainly and deliberately on the poor. This Administration is dominated and directed by wealth and for the accumulation of wealth. It runs smoothly like a well-organized industry and should do so because industry runs it for the benefit of industry. Corporate wealth profits as never before in history. We turn over the national resources to private profit and have few funds left for education, health or housing. Our crime, especially juvenile crime, is increasing. Its increase is perfectly logical; for a generation we have been teaching our youth to kill, destroy, steal and rape in war; what can we expect in peace? We let men take wealth which is not theirs; if the seizure is “legal” we call it high profits and the profiteers help decide what is legal. If the theft is “illegal” the thief can fight it out in court, with excellent chances to win if he receives the accolade of the right newspapers. Gambling in home, church and on the stock market is increasing and all prices are rising. It costs three times his salary to elect a Senator and many millions to elect a President. This money comes from the very corporations which today are the government. This in a real democracy would be enough to turn the party responsible out of power. Yet this we cannot do.

The “other” party has surrendered all party differences in foreign affairs, and foreign affairs are our most important affairs today and take most of our taxes. Even in domestic affairs how does Stevenson differ from Eisenhower? He uses better English than Dulles, thank God! He has a sly humor, where Eisenhower has none. Beyond this Stevenson stands on the race question in the South not far from where his godfather Adlai stood sixty-three years ago, which reconciles him to the South. He has no clear policy on war or preparation for war; on water and flood control; on reduction of taxation; on the welfare state. He wavers on civil rights and his party blocked civil rights in the Senate until Douglas of Illinois admitted that the Democratic Senate would and could stop even the right of Senators to vote. Douglas had a right to complain. Three million voters sent him to the Senate to speak for them. His voice was drowned and his vote nullified by Eastland, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who was elected by 151,000 voters. This is the democracy in the United States which we peddle abroad.

Negroes hope to muster 400,000 votes in 1956. Where will they cast them? What have the Republicans done to enforce the education decision of the Supreme Court? What they advertised as fair employment was exactly nothing, and Nixon was just the man to explain it. What has the Administration done to rescue Negro workers, the most impoverished group in the nation, half of whom receive less than half the median wage of the nation, while the nation sends billions abroad to protect oil investments and help employ slave labor in the Union of South Africa and the Rhodesias? Very well, and will the party of Talmadge, Eastland and Ellender do better than the Republicans if the Negroes return them to office?

I have no advice for others in this election. Are you voting Democratic? Well and good; all I ask is why? Are you voting for Eisenhower and his smooth team of bright ghost writers? Again, why? Will your helpless vote either way support or restore democracy to America?

Is the refusal to vote in this phony election a counsel of despair? No, it is dogged hope. It is hope that if twenty-five million voters refrain from voting in 1956 because of their own accord and not because of a sly wink from Khrushchev, this might make the American people ask how much longer this dumb farce can proceed without even a whimper of protest. Yet if we protest, off the nation goes to Russia and China. Fifty-five American ministers and philanthropists are asking the Soviet Union “to face manfully the doubts and promptings of their conscience.” Can not these do-gooders face their own consciences? Can they not see that American culture is rotting away: our honesty, our human sympathy; our literature, save what we import from abroad? Our only “review” of literature has wisely dropped “literature” from its name. Our manners are gone and the one thing we want is to be rich–to show off. Success is measured by income. University education is for income, not culture, and is partially supported by private industry. We are not training poets or musicians, but atomic engineers. Business is built on successful lying called advertising. We want money in vast amount, no matter how we get it. So we have it, and what then?

Is the answer the election of 1956? We can make a sick man President and set him to a job which would strain a man in robust health. So he dies, and what do we get to lead us? With Stevenson and Nixon, with Eisenhower and Eastland, we remain in the same mess. I will be no party to it and that will make little difference. You will take large part and bravely march to the polls, and that also will make no difference. Stop running Russia and giving Chinese advice when we cannot rule ourselves decently. Stop yelling about a democracy we do not have. Democracy is dead in the United States. Yet there is still nothing to replace real democracy. Drop the chains, then, that bind our brains. Drive the money-changers from the seats of the Cabinet and the halls of Congress. Call back some faint spirit of Jefferson and Lincoln, and when again we can hold a fair election on real issues, let’s vote, and not till then. Is this impossible? Then democracy in America is impossible.




There is a population flush cycle. It churns the population of the United States as if in a blender at the whim of the power elite. At the turn of the 20th century, 88% of all immigrants to the United States were white Europeans. They were allowed to immigrate into America because its 19th century population size was too sparse to fuel its industrial revolution and its consequent consumption boom. In order for the power elite of the gilded age to prosper financially and to maintain ‘white supremacy’, all three conditions had to occur simultaneously.

Sparsely populated territory in the United States was a major problem for the power elite of that time. Land defined national identity. Without manpower, such land could not be held nor developed. Without the manpower to neither hold the land by military force nor develop it by slave or cheap indentured servant labor Britain could not justify it as part of their colonial empire nor could the newly formed United States justify itself as a new nation.[1]

To solve both the problems of 1. removal of unwanted populations and 2. under-population, they employed ‘population flush’.  Population flush involved forcefully pushing indigenous people off their land while simultaneously attracting Europeans to the land and forcefully importing Africans onto the land so that both those populations could hold and develop the land in the name of the newly founded United States.[2]

Population Flush

Periodically and depending on social, economic, and military needs and circumstances, the power elite will turn the immigration ‘on’ switch to full throttle because they need human bodies for material exploitation just like any other natural resource. It is the vast force of immigrant instinctual energy that the power elite wish to harness to build and drive their empire to total world domination.

More and more Europeans were allowed to immigrate into the United States because it was important for the power elite to maintain institutional white supremacy. The U.S. Congress defined the constitutional phrase ‘free persons’ as ‘free white persons’. Thus, white supremacy was the law of the land. Secondly, because African American slave women had a much higher fertility rate than any other ethnic group in the United States.

African American females had 8 babies per female between the ages of 15 and 45 in 1800 compared to Caucasian females’ fertility rate of 7 babies per female for the same age range. Had it not been that millions of white people were imported into the United States, America would have become naturally racially integrated much earlier in the 20th century than it did. What initially drove down fertility rates was urbanization and industrialization. But that necessitated an ever increasing influx of ‘white persons’ from Europe in order to maintain white supremacy in numbers and in political and police power. 

 black fertilityrate 

Furthermore, booming service sectors, as well as coal, iron, and oil industries necessitated bodies to work in them, but not black bodies. Military involvement in World War I necessitated millions of soldiers. So white males immigrated to the United States and assumed employment in the growing manufacturing and military industries. They were limited only by their own natural limitations. Black people were segregated by law at the turn of the 20th century.[3]

The European immigrant tsunami continued to reverberate throughout the early and middle 20th century. Through a major depression white men and women got relief through the Social Security Act of 1935, the Minimum Wage Act of 1938, The Welfare Act of 1935, and ‘the Works Progress Administration program’ or WPA under the Roosevelt ‘New Deal’.

After World War II, white men and women benefited from the: Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944 or the G.I. Bill.[4] They bought homes and they and their children attended colleges and Universities for free. America was at its peak. It afforded to the White Supremacists’ baby boom generations a historically unparalleled experience of affluence in the United States.  They have come to be called ‘Greatest Generation’ but in truth they were the ‘greatest racially privileged generation of all time’. But what goes up must come down so says the law of gravity.

During this same several decades a shift slowly occurred.  Both black and white women started to have fewer babies. By 1970, the fertility rate for black women had fallen to 3 per female between 15 and 45 and for white women it had fallen even more to 2 babies per female for the same age group.  And now in 2016, for black women a fertility rate of 1.8 and for white women a fertility rate of 1.9, both beneath replacement level.[5]

What happened? What stopped the baby boom in its tracks? Why is America now compelled to import spermatozoa and ova?

The answer is simple. First in 1959-60 the birth control pill was approved by the FDA and introduced into the market place via hospitals and family physicians. Secondly, in 1972-73 the United States Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, made abortion legal. Since that year there have been over 56,000,000 abortions had by U.S. women. That number nearly offsets the approximately 66,000,000 baby boomer babies born between 1946 and 1964. Thirdly, manufacturing jobs have been steadily exported overseas to exploit cheap labor. That has made the cost of living rise far too high for many Americans to have large families or even to get married early in their 20s. It has been recently reported by the Pew Research Center that 36% of all men 18 to 31 live at home with their parents.[6]  Three reasons were given:

Declining employment. In 2012, 63% of 18- to 31-year-olds had jobs, down from the 70% of their same-aged counterparts who had jobs in 2007. In 2012, unemployed Millennials were much more likely than employed Millennials to be living with their parents (45% versus 29%).

Rising college enrollment. In March 2012, 39% of 18- to 24-year-olds were enrolled in college, up from 35% in March 2007. Among 18 to 24 year olds, those enrolled in college were much more likely than those not in college to be living at home – 66% versus 50%.

Declining marriage. In 2012 just 25% of Millennials were married, down from the 30% of 18- to 31-year-olds who were married in 2007. Today’s unmarried Millennials are much more likely than married Millennials to be living with their parents (47% versus 3%).”

In 1960, the median age at first marriage in the United States was 22.8 years for males and 20.3 for females compared to 28.2 years for males and 26.1 for females in 2010.

Those statistical figures signal to the power elite that African Americans who are descendants of slaves will soon be finished as a viable population in the United States. Descendants of slaves will generally be unable to compete in the economy except in the entertainment markets including sports. 

The power elite are those owners and CEOs of the most powerful and wealthiest corporations and financial institutions in the United States.They are not necessarily those individuals listed in Forbes Fortune 500. The 100 wealthiest Americans are not necessarily of the power elite because power and wealth do not always go together. One may be rich and not powerful. But power always goes with wealth, military and police force.

If we assume all present social and economic trends remain steady in slave quarters within inner city communities, what can we predict? We can predict that descendants of slaves will for all intents and purposes disappear as a politically and economically relevant ethnic group by the end of the 21st century. As the sociologist Sidney M. Wilhelm asked back in 1970: “Who Needs the Negro?”

The same holds true for lower and middle class white men and women. They now are coming to realize that being ‘white’ is not enough to get economic privilege in the new world order.

Already, the white middle class which for the last 70 years has brought home the bread and butter for Uncle Sam is now held up solely by credit debt. It is becoming more and more difficult to keep up the façade of middle class status and conspicuous consumption.

Most middle and lower class families have an income to debt ratio which is heavily tilted on the side of debt. That is also reflected in the national ‘debt to GDP’ ratio. Both they and the Federal government are for all practical purposes bankrupt.

The demise of white people in the United States is also evidenced by the life-span for white males. It is falling lower and lower every year. And this is just the beginning. It was reported in the April 20, 2016 edition of the Wall Street Journal that: The number of years a white American born in 2014 could be expected to live fell to 78.8 years from 78.9 years the year before, according to the CDC. The change was driven largely by women.”

However, elite white males with higher incomes which allow them to afford new stem cell treatment health care can expect to become the new ‘Alpha’ males in the ‘Brave New World’ they are now engineering with biotechnology and robotics. They will live long, healthy, wealthy lives.

Those are just simply the facts. Those facts are not presented by me to be a moral argument. Though I do have a moral position. Rather, those facts beg a question: why did the United States Supreme Court sanction the abortion of millions of babies? Could they not foresee that the nation would become dependent on importing millions upon millions of immigrants to fill the population vacuum? Immigrants who are not acculturated to the American way of life. There is an answer.


The power elite do not want a settled population with family roots dating back 400 years to colonial times. They do not want a historically knowledgeable population, a population of critical thinkers, a population of people who now know for instance that both the Republican and Democratic political parties are corrupt and corrosive to the very fabric of our democratic process. The power elite prefer a climate of social and political confusion and lower class cultural and economic instability.

The power elite want public confusion because they thrive in environments rich with political and economic confusion. For them, confusion is a resource. With it, they are better able to manipulate a docile population from their Tower of Babel.

The power elite want a population already conditioned to live under dictatorships and authoritarian governments of every kind. They want a population with a high tolerance for both political corruption and death squad law enforcement. They want a population willing to pay 50% of their wages in Taxation. They want a population which having not known the tradition of freedom will be willing to sign freedom away for a bag of Cheetos. That is the answer. That is why we are now in the height of a population flush cycle.

Today, the population of the United States is simply a human resource. Like a fossil fuel, Americans are burnt up, their energy exploited at the whim and pleasure of the power elite, and then when they have become old they are discarded as waste one generation after another onto a pile of human refuse. For it is the power elite who control the levers of an ever oscillating population flush cycle to serve their purposes.


[1] The Nomos of the Earth, by Carl Schmitt, Telos Press Publishing, 2006

[2] Johnson vM’Intosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823)

[3] Plessy vFerguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)

[4] P.L. 78-346, 58 Stat. 284m

[5] United States Census, National Vital Statistics Report, 2010

[6] A Rising Share of Young Adults Live in Their Parents’ Home

      A Record 21.6 Million In 2012 BY RICHARD FRY




cropped to image, recto

Today, I was thinking about a geological process called tectonic plate drift. For hundreds of millions of years, the continents we live on have been drifting or floating on top of the earth’s mantle. The mantle has plasticity and is a molten rock part of the earth’s interior. It churns by the force of gravity and by the heating up and cooling down of the molten rock.

 The result of this repetitive temperature variation in the mantle is that the surface of the earth undergoes continuous change in its continental positions and thus makes different continental formations over vast periods of time. Sometimes they are together as a whole and sometimes the continents fragment into many parts. The cycle goes on and on. 

This constant flux and instability then turned my thoughts to the very complex and dysfunctional social, environmental, and political situation we live in. On all levels, the United States is in crises mode as is the entire world.

On the social horizon, there are no sound logical solutions to the countless problems we face. That is so because the dramatic stage whereon we act out our lives was founded upon false ideas. The idea that some people are born to be slaves or that society is a mirror image of predator and prey relations in the wilds. That kind of illogical thinking inevitably makes more links in a long chain of destructive decisions and actions which warp the fabric of our social relations.   

The philosopher Plato understood the inevitable end of illogical thinking. He made it clear in his ‘Allegory of the Cave’ that those who reason on false premises or shadows on the wall are doomed to spiritual emptiness and ultimate social collapse. 

I understand both scientifically and spiritually what is driving the mass dysfunction which makes America a very sick society. Increased suicide rates, increased prescription drug addiction, and a decreasing human life span are all inconsistent with the myth of what America is suppose to stand for. 

I know that most human beings are driven by their organic unconscious biological instincts namely fear and sexuality. But in combination with those basic animal instincts there generally exists very poor logical thinking exercised most of the time by most people. That is precisely why events go awry. 

For example, why would a person who is obese and at risk for dozens of diseases and a premature death continue to consume a diet that will ultimately kill him or her? Why would they allow their children to do so? Knowing full well that what confronts them are but two alternatives: change or die.

I understand that some very intelligent people understand those unconscious biological drives. They have worked hard to master methods of unconscious population manipulation for the sole purposes of economically exploiting the environment, control of mass populations of people, and ruling over them politically. Despite the intelligence of the power elite they intentionally do wrong to others for monetary profit or simply for pleasure. That fact underscores to me what their core beliefs are.

Some intelligent people who are determined to benefit themselves at the expense of others believe in and practice scientific racism or social Darwinism. Social Darwinism is predicated on the fallacious premise that there is an absolute natural standard of fitness by means of which unfit human beings can be identified. From that premise, it is deduced that once the unfit are identified they can be eliminated effectively washing the gene pool clean and making it fit.

A glaring antithesis to their claim that there is an absolute standard of natural human fitness is their claim that evolutionary change is a law of organic nature. Their argument for evolutionary change is antithetical to their idea of an absolute standard of fitness because evolutionary change presupposes genetic and phenotypical maladjustment to a broader natural environment.  In short, evolutionary change means that a specie is in a constant a state of unfitness, and thus on the chopping block, and subject for natural elimination.  

This may seem a stretch, but for example, a pattern of lowered human I.Q. in a population could be a signal of human brain adaption in reverse. A cerebral reversal in humans to restore balance between the human species and nature at large.  Such a restoration of balance in the natural environment would save both  humans and nature from technological destruction.

Put another way, if we toxify the environment, in more or less the same proportion the environment toxifies our bodies. If we make nature at large infertile, then proportionately nature makes us infertile at large. We are at a disadvantage in that kind of action and reaction contest with nature because nature is bigger than us and because nature has masterfully eliminated trillions of species before us and yet continues to move along its course. I do not suggest that nature is personal; nature is very impersonal in its relation to us. It’s just the way it does business.

Though such beliefs and practices expressed in mythological form by people date back far into ancient human history long before Charles Darwin wrote his book which gave rise to the phrase: “Survival of the Fit.”, power elites down through the ages have practiced the survival of the fit ideology on the premise that human reason or rationality are necessarily to be driven by human unconscious instincts. The general acceptance of social Darwinism by most people today has made a wide pathway for the worst kind of people to ascend to the top of our social hierarchies where decisions affecting billions of people are made. The result is now a disaster.

For example, it has become an established fact that human industries have released billions of tons of carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere for over the last one hundred years. Those gases in the atmosphere are correlated with a 1-degree Celsius rise in global warming and extreme weather climate change over the last 100 years. Industries which polluted the atmosphere were allowed to operate despite the fact that it was reported by the Journal of Science in 1896 that the release of those gases caused by burning fossil fuels would cause a greenhouse effect thus making the earth surface temperature warmer. Why?

If we assume that intelligent people who owned those industries and politicians who legally sanctioned toxic industries knew how to do a basic scientific cost/benefit analysis or a risk analysis of the long term consequences of ‘the greenhouse effect’ on the global environment, that begs the question: why did they persist in doing what they knew would eventually cause a global crisis and death to billions of people in the future?

That answer is simple. Those intelligent psychopaths didn’t give a flying ducks quack about the future of billions of people nor the planet earth hundreds of years into the future after they are dead. They viewed only short term benefits and costs to them during their life time.

They rationally concluded that what happens to the planet and the animals on it after they are dead is irrelevant to what they wanted in their life time. They are attracted to money, fame, power, control, status, prestige, and all other possible pleasures in their life time or in the here and now. They figured that once they were dead that nothing on earth or for that matter in the universe could either benefit or cost them nor put them at risk of harm because they believed that at death they simply cease to exist. They were selfish. It’s that simple.

All intelligent psychopathic power elite, oligarchs, or tyrants operate on that same premise because they have no conscience nor the compassion or empathetic feelings associated with what we know to be human conscience. As a consequence, most people suffer politically from what is known as a kakistocracy. Kakistocracy means government controlled by the least qualified or most unprincipled citizens. Eventually, such people destroy other people along with themselves and are now working on the destruction of the world we have come to know as our home.

The Burned earth

I understand that the kind of economic exploitation we suffer overlaps all societies and exists within every class or caste level, ethnicity or race everywhere in the world and that it has existed throughout history. It simply underscores the fact that we have yet to find a way to vet psychopaths out of our economic and political systems or to prevent them from infiltrating into our political systems.

I understand the connection between humans’ biological instincts and social/economic slavery. Intelligent people who are also psychopathic know that they can enslave most people to do their will by addicting them to substances of all kinds ranging from food to drugs, material possessions and status, or false beliefs.  Or they can enslave most people by instilling in them fear of pain and or death.

Yet, people are at least minimally rational unless they are intellectually defective. So, most people are able to understand when they are being short changed and by whom as one would feel when he or she is cheated in a supermarket because they do not receive the correct change in exchange for a purchase.

But most people tacitly accept servitude to a power elite rather than choose to be free. In other words, they internalize subconsciously a self-image of being a slave and then through that internalized image interpret their social relations as inferior to the political and economic power elite. They then go about acting out accordingly. This is true everywhere despite the fact that cultures differ more or less throughout the world.

I started this talk with some thoughts I had on geographical continental drift. For me it indicates that no matter how powerful or large a thing may appear to be whether it be empires, nations, clans, tribes, and individuals, each and every one of them will come to its end and be destroyed.

If you are a scientist or scholar, then you know that that which begins in one form must end in another form according to the law of thermodynamics. If you are a follower of Jesus, then you know of the famous quote: “I am the Alpha and the Omega…the beginning and the end; the first and the last.” If you are a Muslim, then you know the verse in the Quran: “We are not to be frustrated in changing your forms and creating you again in forms that you know not.”.


skin-bleaching 1

Cosmetic allegiance is an issue of sovereign rights. The way a people decide to adorn themselves constitute a territory where foreign office holds no legitimacy.

However, when the application of cosmetics involves the elimination of an individual’s phenotypical characteristics like that of his color, then it ceases to be an aesthetic practice.  Instead, it becomes racial denial and a hysterical allegiance to mythical archetypes.

This is precisely what the practice of skin bleaching is. Common sense demands serous scrutiny of this problem which has become global. Why don’t modifications of one’s hair, height, or weight and even cosmetic surgery align with this same practice?

Skin bleaching – elicits three facts. First, the negation of self that is, secondly, coupled with the veneration of the imitated other. And thirdly, the ‘imitated other’ which is posed as most exquisite.  Even more, the cosmeticized person becomes a canvas on which is constructed the image of the subjugator who invalidates the basic premise of human equality. The latter – cosmetic surgery – is rooted in a desire to uplift corporal features in order to meet certain standards without necessarily subjugating those who may be lacking in them.

In The Clash of civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Samuel Huntington’s analysis is keen except for a solid thesis which nails down how race and color have played an important role in shaping, most of the time, these clashes of civilizations. W.E.B. Dubois corroborates this point when he stated in The soul of black folks, p.9.: “The problem of the twentieth century is the problem of the color-line, – the relation of the darker to the light races of men in Asia and Africa, in America and the islands of the sea.”

Although skin bleaching is self-denial do to its negation of essential body features, these practices beg the question whether or not the practice has existential value for the one cosmeticized. While existence is primarily a matter of the mind according to modern thinkers: “I think, therefore I am”, contemporary philosophical thought holds that understanding how perception works is the key to understanding just how one assigns value to existence.

What is meant here is that the inter-subjective reality or dialectical nature of man is what constitute his primary mode of existence. Merleu-Ponty calls it the primacy of perception.  In his Phenomenology of Perception, p.169., he writes: “The body is our general medium for having a world.” This claim pregnant with questions both philosophical and practical especially in a world where how you look determines who you are. It is therefore not an exaggeration to say that the clash of civilizations (cultures, religions, etc) is more so a clash of perceptions which embody not only the antagonism between different spheres of existence called cultures but also peoples and their colors. By perceiving the world, we get an image of ourselves by which we define and value [our] existence.

Having established the conceptual basis which defines existence – at least phenomenologically under the banner of perception (for in all interactions, interpretation, and quest for meaning or sense of self, it is always indispensable) I will outline how one of these aspects of perception has been instrumental in the practice of skin bleaching. Skin bleaching by black people is a practice designed primarily to modify their own perception and ‘imitate other’s’ perception since it determines the valuation of their existence.

The Social distance scale of Emory Bogardus – 1930, brings to light the idea of the agreeableness of being white and the liability of being its opposite or black. For black on the scale is non-desirable. It is a phenomenon rooted in diverse myriad conceptions that have lasted over centuries and survives to the present day.

On the line between white and black which incarnates in the world a divide between rich and poor, good and bad, intelligent and dull, opportunity and despair, happiness and sadness, light and darkness or again norm and abnormal, skin bleaching appears as a palliative option and recourse that would admittedly bridge the gap at best or at least reduce it. In any case, for the practitioner something should be done to their black skin since the divide which caused them grueling anxiety is based on it.

Whether the bleaching is done or not, the perception of a black person’s skin color shapes his or her identity. It shapes his or her existence which in most cases is in suspended animation due to its devaluation.

The argument for skin bleaching follows seven main lines of thought which do not pretend to be exhaustive but is meant to showcase the general character of the practice and how it affects a whole organ. As such, these shall be articulated around the following: mythos, thymos, ploutos, ethos, eros, pathos and logos. Can we proceed?

Mythos: Veneration of Illusion and the Creation of Rites for Dead Gods

In this photo taken Feb. 15, 2011, a woman applies skin lightening cream to her legs as she sits on a curb in downtown Kingston, Jamaica. People around the world often try to alter their skin color, using tanning salons or dyes to darken it or other chemicals to lighten it. In the slums of Jamaica, doctors say the skin lightening phenomenon has reached dangerous proportions. (AP Photo/Caterina Werner)

In this photo taken Feb. 15, 2011, a woman applies skin lightening cream to her legs as she sits on a curb in downtown Kingston, Jamaica. People around the world often try to alter their skin color, using tanning salons or dyes to darken it or other chemicals to lighten it. In the slums of Jamaica, doctors say the skin lightening phenomenon has reached dangerous proportions. (AP Photo/Caterina Werner)

A myth is simply a lie; it is told skillfully over and over to make people believe and behave in a given way. Plato had such an idea when he said in The Republic: “How then do we devise one of those needful falsehoods, if that be possible, and at any rate the rest of the City.” And among the lies he told, was his conception on intelligence which emanated from the divine and associated with self-discipline the color white while the opposite of these are associated with black. Once the lie is believed, lives would be changed.

“Emeka is a very beautiful girl like no other from the Eastern part of Nigeria. Dark in complexion and sober in composure. After secondary school at the age of 18, she went to the State University of Anambra. Everyone knows her for her outstanding beauty, soothed dark skin and corpulence of proportion. She was not of the richest families but had never been lacking in complements or suitors from the most modest handyman to the haughty politicians and tycoon business owners of the City.

While waiting to make a decision on marriage, she had decided to first focus on her education in accordance with the exigency of modern times and the wish of her parents. After a few years in the University, one could notice that she is becoming lighter and lighter while her soothing darkness is steadily disappearing. At 25, after her Master’s degree in Mass Communication, she had become a light girl, and had a position in a local broadcasting company reporting on issues related to sports and women’s affairs. For onlookers who never knew her, she looks like a natural light skin girl. Light in complexion she is now engaged to a medical doctor and hoping to get married soon. She is happy, her family too, and the millions of girls in Nigeria dream to be like her. They envy not only her academic accomplishments and devotedness but also her love life, family life as well as her beauty, more precisely her color. Case closed, it’s time to settle and take care of children.

This is a typical pattern for most young girls in Nigeria. A country wherein about 77% of skin bleaching products are used by Nigerians according to the World Health Organization. The remaining 23% are those who cannot use the skin bleaching products because they live in remote areas where cosmetic products are not easily accessible.

In fact, there is a myth now becoming a religion which holds that being whitish is better and has been absorbed in the minds of young Africans who dream of nothing else but being like white ladies. For, how could a young lady Emeka, who has never questioned her beauty still believe that she needed to tone out her blackness to look better? This illustrates not only the power of media, especially Nollywood which usually gives star roles to beautiful light skin girls while reserving the ‘mean’ or abrasive roles for girls and women of dark features, but it is also the influence of myths which have played an important role of propagandizing a false conception of beauty and aesthetics.

Thymos: The Foundation of Aesthetical Quest

Skin bleaching is a symptom which reveals a psychological problem of low self-esteem, low self-importance, and low self-worth or desire for recognition. The combination of all these concepts fit into a more general term antithymos meaning ‘low spiritedness’. The definition characterizes all of these and is more explicit in setting out that inner desire of humans to be seen as good, important and of value. Francis Fukuyama in his book: The End of History, p. xix., acknowledges that the desire for recognition is the motor of history. The word self-esteem does no justice to this deep sentiment in humans to be recognized by their peers and the broader population. For women, and now in the post-modern West what is viewed as the feminization of man, it is manifested by exhibiting corporal features in the most striking and ‘acceptable’ way that would attract the most attention.

Skin bleaching is an apology though expressed in a naïve way. It is generally admitted that beauty brings self-confidence and greater self-esteem. What happens when beauty is associated with whiteness? Those who are white, or have a light complexion turn out to have a light self-esteem compared to their black counterparts. Researchers Verna Keith and Maxine Thompson through their article The Blacker the Berry: Gender, Skin Tone, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in Gender and Society, pointed out clearly that among African American descendants of slaves there is a strong correlation between self-esteem and skin-tone which indicates an internalization of colorism. This correlation, they admitted, is even more exhibited among low income women. In Africa, skin-tone boost the self-esteem of women who believe they are more beautiful being light skinned.  But such practice is more common among those with affordable incomes than those in the villages and outskirts. So, in the future there may be class overtones in Nigeria which are skin color based as well.

These researchers went as far as demonstrating that it has an impact on educational achievement, prison sentencing, and even the likelihood of being elected into congress.

But self-esteem and self-confidence are not the embodiment of what defines thymos, i.e., the desire for recognition. Perhaps, it should be said that that is the fast-track towards ‘ideals’ of recognition. And like other fast-track options, their sustainability is easily put to trial and easily challenged.

It may be a no-brainer to remind anyone that skin bleaching is not appropriate but perpetrators will willingly admit that it helps them to achieve what they want. Skin bleaching therefore becomes a mode of survival in a complex world of limited opportunities and possibilities.       

Ploutos: “Just Being White You’ll Win”

 Vera-Sidika skin bleaching 2

Recently, an ad in Thailand dated January 08, 2016 claimed that “Just being white you’ll win.” Although the outcry of viewers obliged the barons to make a weak apology by stating that they never intended to hurt anyone, the message was already passed and the marketing scheme was achieved: put brazen attention on the subject while selling its products. In fact, it is a general protocol of those with biased views to say the most outrageous things, then apologize a few days later, then continue to say the same thing, then apologize again. Before they get tired, another person takes up the same vicious circle with similar outrageous comments, then apologizes and so on. The pattern, which is clear enough, leaves no room to doubt that there is no willingness to apologize as a way of changing an act or as a sign of contrition. In modern times, making an apology, especially in racial colloquial mischief, is a matter of social and marketing etiquette than it is a heartfelt willingness to change.

Few people are skilled enough to read the unconscious mind of others, but when skin bleaching becomes so pervasive in Africa one can only guess that it is related to the survival of some of those who practice it. Users might not necessarily know – explicitly, when they become addicted to it. If you ask them if they want to be white, a timid shrug follows because they know they are rooted to diverse practices from food to language very different from the person s/he wants to imitate. But don’t make the assumption that looking black[ish] is good. So, if the unconscious mind can’t be seen, its symptoms can. These symptoms appear in words and actions which manifest the nausea that being white[ish] increases your chances of succeeding in society.

Despite the outrage from the commercial which said “just being white you’ll win,” it appears that it extracts its axioms from the general hysteria of the public whose amnesia on the nature of man becomes more vivid than ever. But how do you win being white?

Ploutos is the Greek word for wealth which has been used here in opposition to money which is chrimata. Ploutos refers to the various vertical acquisitions which distinguishes a person from being poor irrespective of monetary equivalence: education, business, appointment, jobs, social capital etc. The skin lightening/bleaching industry is expected to reach about 10 billion by 2015, according to Skin Inc. June 23, 2009. While it is a source of wealth for the industries and their retailers, it is equally a means by which users believe they may increase their chances of vertical mobility in society: landing a good job, sports, or associating with those of the higher orbit.

By using various schools of thought, myths and laws (Plato’s Metaphor of two lovers, the myths of the metals, a sliding scale of justice by Aristotle, and even the USA Constitution) which classified humans from their whitest to their darkest using various approaches, Dr. Steven Nur Ahmed proves in A Particular Line of reasoning, 2015, that economic consequences follow such a thought pattern.

But there is more into skin bleaching than simply the desire to improve one’s wealth and feel better. There is also the question of love, sex, and marriage. 

Eros: Sex, Love, Marriage and Color

Eros, the embodiment of emotional energy, sometimes related to sex, is a force that controls humans lives in ways unimaginable from the minute aspects of clothing to the greatest like the wish to be a billionaire or a CEO of a fortune 500 hundred company.

As mentioned earlier, most African women with lighter skin have a higher self-esteem than women with darker skin. But it must be said that such self-esteem comes not necessarily from the conviction of self-proclaimed beauty but from the belief that she would possibly get a better lover or spouse along the way. Being light-skinned becomes a strategic front design to attract a spouse of one’s choice – usually the one with a higher purchasing power. It is no surprise that in Nigeria, some Igbo charge higher bride price for light women and lesser for the darker ones. This instrumentalization of beauty to the detriment of common sense only increases the problem.

Perhaps the problem lies with black men for their preference for light-skinned women as Ntambwe (2002) writes: “The majority of black men prefer light-skinned women as partners, girlfriends or wives. Several authors have stated that these light-skinned women are perceived as attractive, intelligent, moral, sexually more desirable, even chaste; whereas dark-skinned are regarded as mean, evil, stupid, even not as trust-worthy.” But whether men should be held responsible for this misplaced perception is a matter ethical/moral writ which shall be considered in the next section on ethos.

 From women’s perspective, issues of love and marriage are comparably of value only to that of life and death. Because they’re of utmost importance to them they’ll do all it takes to reach their state of self-accomplishment – fulfill existence. Since they stand on the passive side waiting for their desired spouse to make a move it follows that their best recourse for attracting attention and be competitive depends on possessing those striking features which would prompt men to action.

All means are good so long as they reach their goal and skin bleaching is one of them. In this light, it is no doubt that lecturing African women on how to maintain natural beauty is usually a vain exercise for the most part. Their whole existence is tuned primarily to being beautiful, to be seen as such, always complimented as such, and when she notices that such compliments or suitors are reducing or remain constant she will then increase the dose of her concoctions. Facebook, Instagram, Nollywood, Hollywood and the entire media all participate in this social drama. The advent of social media has given the opportunity for African women to display the triumph of their cosmetic metamorphosis by successes easily measured by the amount of likes she receives as well as comments. Is this appropriate? This appears to be the right question here because “if it works, don’t fix it” as the popular saying goes. 

Ethos: Ethical Concerns

 Besides feeling the need to feel important, recognized or to be beautiful – as it is claimed, is it of ethical stance to erode the melanin of one’s skin using corrosive substances for the end of looking light? While beauty is believed to be in the eyes of the beholder, ethics on the contrary lies in the minds of the one who withstands the test of rationality and reasonability.

The ethical consideration shall be comprised of four arguments: who is responsible for the acts, is it admissible morally to tone one’s skin, should it be regulated socially/institutionally, and should we question if we have failed/betrayed dark-skinned women by choosing light ones or by deciding to bleach and be apart from them? On the last note, the ethical question enlarges more to a legal and community problem which enters into the heart of social justice and the defense of common welfare in an era of individualism and capitalism whose remnants, as can be seen, appear visibly in skin bleaching.

Milly Mira is a Cameroonian US based blogger who believes that African men created skin bleaching. Here is her argument on 1st of December 2015: “Many African men are hypocrites because they are the first to mock girls and women with lighten skins but are the first to pick a fair skinned girl as their idea skin tone.” She continued her argument: “I have had discussions with many single male friends who are purportedly ‘ready to settle’ and need a hook up. When I ask what attributes they find attractive or are looking for in a girl the first thing ‘one that looks like you.’ What percentage of Africans (Cameroonians) are naturally light-skinned? … if there is demand we will supply okay.” This is not just an economic anecdote but also an attempt to remain credible.

Since morality is based on responsibility, on personal acts, how an individual reacts to personal, social, and structural pressures impounding on his conscience and freewill, then it will be admitted that those imputed are primarily the users.

Furthermore, is it moral to bleach one’s skin? Skin bleaching comes with peculiar traits. In principle, morality takes root in the conscience [nature], grows through the mind [nurture] develops through society [law] and ends in the will [love], (K. Emilton, p.122.). This synopsis on morality puts us in a fragmented diagnosis where blame becomes difficult to establish. While the conscience may timidly admit that it is wrong to willingly change one’s skin color, the mind – which is built through society – has developed arguments to accept and accommodate it as normal in a society which has not yet define it as a punishable act. But does this end in love? Considering the fact that the basis of bleaching was hate (in a soft sense), it would only be a surprise to imagine that it leads to love – characterized by respect of self and others. In fact, denying one’s own blackness makes us guilty of disrespect in the face of blackness in the other.

Concerning its regulation, in May 2015, the Ivory Coast is known to have imposed a ban on skin-bleaching products which have caused great damage to the minds of its young people. Most African countries remain indifferent and the individual is left to his fate. But the banning of these corrosive products doesn’t stop the Ivorian media from choosing light-skinned women as program hostess or giving them lead roles in movies, or choosing them as wives/girlfriends thereby perpetuating the same malaise that the legislation intended to curb. Gambia and South Africa have equally issued bans but there is no evidence that the public has stopped using them.

Finally, the role of the law comes in as a recognition that there is a communal responsibility of helping each member of a community to live to their fullest potentials, to be themselves and above all to be respected for who they are – humans. But this communal responsibility, a type of social ethos, falls only on a few who believe that they must protect each other. In fact, in modern society, it is difficult to be indifferent. One can’t have an uncontrollable desire for light-skinned women while being fair to dark-skin women in the same way. And if and only if society assumes the stance that skin bleaching goes beyond an individual’s decision then change would be far from possible. “if the arm is sick, the whole body gets affected.”

Pathos: Pathology of Skin Bleaching

Black Woman's Pain Lead Pic

To understand the pathological state in which most blacks live there is no better description than the lucid work of psychiatrist Franz Fanon’s book: Black Skin White Mask: The experiences of a black man in a white world. He admits in his premise that the juxtaposition of the white and black races has created a massive psycho-existential complex. Using various examples from real life experiences including his own, he affirms that only a psychoanalytical interpretation of the black problem can lay bare the anomalies of affect that are responsible for the structure of the complex.

Two pathological patterns shall be examined from his analysis. The first narrates the way the woman of color behaves with the white man which he finds incomprehensible. Referring particularly to the Antilles woman of color, he explains that her main dream is to meet a white man with whom she’ll get married. Despite having suitors who are educated, responsible and ready to love them wholeheartedly, she still despises them just because they are black, low class while waiting for the day the white man will knock on her door.

Chris Rock, the American comedian and actor made reference to this when he joked about black women saying: there’s never a perfect match; you’re a black woman, he’s a black man. Contrary to common sense which holds that man is a motion towards the world and towards his like (Franz Fanon), with the black woman, being with his like sounds like a taboo. The opposite of this holds true. The black man dreams of being with a white woman who most of the time repudiates him. Drawing from his personal experience, he concludes that the black person’s mind has been completely destroyed and needs liberation through psychoanalysis.

While psychoanalysis intends to explore the unconscious to uncover unrecognized symptoms which produce unhappiness in most people, its application to color hysteria is not only legitimate and audacious but also daring.

However, this analytical undertaking enlightens more in its theoretical coherence than in its practical realization. In fact, it is a question of operation a social-therapy, or applying psychoanalysis to a group of people in a way that challenges even history and the processes that align with it. Like events in spatiotemporal dynamics, it must be believed that with the strength of the mind or reason (logos) change can be initiated and balance restored.    

Logos: The Redefining of Self or Saving Man from Self through Reason

Back to the basis and basics of existence, the recourse to the resource of the mind remains indispensable in understanding how man should proceed in his complex life. Phenomenology provides an admirable point of view according to Merleau-Ponty: “Our view of man will remain superficial so long as we fail to go back to that origin [of silence], so long as we fail to find, beneath the chatter of words, the primordial silence, and as long as we do not describe the action which breaks this silence. The spoken gesture, and its meaning, a world.”

Rightfully, phenomenology triumphs because it is the only exercise that restores originality and authenticity. All other sciences, hard to soft, have been excellent in one way or another to open the sore in the stigmata of color, leaving man open to himself. Even if a socio-therapy should succeed, a phenomenological approach to this discipline shall be indispensable in making sense. This is the indisputable base from which to start after which other arguments may be built unto this foundation.

 Skin bleaching, though it refers to a single act of modifying one’s color, reveals a cry for a whole existence; one that has lost its center of gravity, and until this center is reached the periphery continues to revolve endlessly is wandering confusion.

The fall of communist socialism had made most people to undermine the ideas of Karl Marx while academic institutions are known to perpetuate to young learners, mainly the poor, ideas that never got accomplished. In fact, one of the key principles of Marx is his recognition of the fact the material processes – through the labor of man, contribute considerably in defining the mental structure of his existence. Man, estranged through capital becomes alienated from himself and from his own humanity. Without reigniting a fight against capital[ism], the black man, after all his discourse and awareness, shall be obliged to answer the ultimate question of his existence and means of survival through his work, creativity and the development of those instruments that have participated in his non-existence.

The ‘narrative has changed’ but only when that narrative takes charge of a social structural ‘narration’ whose final end is productive infrastructures that define and guide ongoing social narration will reason overcome the pathos of skin bleaching.