Four police officers were murdered and one wounded in Oakland in 2009 in broad daylight; a three year old child was gunned down in August 2011; a father was beaten to death in front of his son in broad daylight; in 2007, journalist Chauncey Bailey was murdered in broad daylight; more children were shot in 2012; and the number of shootings and homicide continue to rise in the city of Oakland, 131 for the year 2012. As of December 2012, the murder rate constituted a 42% percent increase over 2010. And over 37 years has an average of 109 murders per year.
The African American culture is not the same culture today that emerged from the post civil war slave plantation culture. That culture was driven by freed men and women who envisioned hope in their future. Rather, this other culture is a culture of parolees who are never set free from their bondage to punishment and who thus never have their hope in a future rekindled.
Their culture is a prison yard culture. It is that prison yard culture they participate in; it is not a vital culture. Parolees live devitalized and dependent lives because they are prescribed the role of social burden and they know it. They feel it every day and night. It is painful to them.
The prison yard culture is a transplanted culture having many collateral effects on many individuals in many communities because of an increasing incarceration rate over the past thirty-seven years. There are many examples. Oakland, California, is one where for more than 37 years layer upon layer and generation after generation of parolees have been compelled to live impoverished lives concentrated in small pockets of the city without the full enjoyment of the bill of rights.
That thesis is predicated on the fact that the state parolee population of Alameda County was approximately 3,462 on any given day in 2005 add to that the number of Federal, state Youth Authority parolees, and Alameda County jail probationers over the same period of time and we multiply that number by thirty five (years) we arrive at an approximate figure of 121,170. There are approximately 400,000 people who live in Oakland. In 2005 there were 1,508 on parole. Do the math.
What we are dealing with is the likelihood that about twenty percent of Oakland’s population has been incarcerated or in jail at some time over the past thirty-five years. In some areas of the city that percent is even higher. We are also faced with the horrific fact that over 30 percent of the Oakland population has suffered a murdered relative or friend. Such deep and pervasive sorrow sours the very core of interpersonal relations in the city. Oakland is made up of thousands of depressed individuals. For that reason a pall hangs over the city as thick as smog as hundreds of processions carrying the dead flow through its streets every year and there is no indication that it will subside within any reasonable time.
All institutions are feeling the stress of the prison yard culture; poor families cannot carry the burden it puts upon them. Even Congress has been tinkering with a ‘Second Chance Act’ because the widespread discrimination of ex-felons is shoring up the prison yard culture and causing it to burst all social levees such as prisons, jails, parole, and probation departments. AB 109 signed into law on April 5th 2011 will increase the rate of cultural disintegration in Oakland because the county jail ‘levees’ will not hold for long because over 90% of the persons incarcerated return to society, eventually.
It is causing a facial change in the communities, too, as more armed guards make constitutionally free communities take on the visage of controlled environments like prison. Citizens are more likely than ever before to look up and see armed guards in traditionally safe zones like schools, hospitals, supermarkets, and restaurants. They too are beginning to feel the paradox of their ‘guarded liberty’. They are beginning to feel occupied. They are beginning to apply the concept of a ‘dead zone’ to their neighborhoods.
Moreover, such environments incubate the prison yard culture mind-set because it is that environment which submerges their constitutional freedoms to the demands of police necessity. It has turned police officers into jailers; it has turned their oath of service and protection to community into a visceral obsessive compulsion to control everyone. Their fear of wrongdoers is now greater than the fear wrongdoers have of them. We should not be surprised; such is the guard-convict syndrome. It too has become a characteristic of the transplanted culture. It now is a permanent characteristic of those who live in neighborhoods throughout Oakland.
The police, surrounded by a community of mistrusted parolees, cease to trust ‘the public’ because that public is often predominantly the offspring of the prison yard cultural mindset. So, they cease to serve the ‘public’ because they do not recognize it as a community of freedmen and women. That community has become indistinguishable from the mass of marginalized parolees. The police community then becomes an island unto itself as socially marginalized as the parolees and equally mistrusted and dangerous to the citizens they serve. For example, on August 13, 2011, a homeless man raised a stick in the presence of an Oakland police officer. That man was shot dead. It’s happening everywhere; sometimes phrased as ‘stand your ground’; ‘he was wearing a hood’; ‘he was sagging’. All are but a pretext to murder; a justification, usually to murder African American youth who are presumed to be of the more than 25% who have been incarcerated.
Here is exactly where the prison yard culture thrives because it feeds on repressive environments where freedom is sacrificed in the name of punishment. It is a culture not of disclosure but of criminal conspiracy and solicitation. It is an environment in which the yard is divided into antagonistic forces. Each submerged in their conspiracies to denigrate the other. This avalanche cannot be stopped soon.
The tipping point was reached years ago. As a consequence, traditional cultures such as that in the African American community, already supported by weak infrastructures such as the family most of which have been ripped to shreds, are being displaced by values which originate in the prison yard culture. The African American culture is no longer a traditional culture. It is a cultural hybrid of contradictory and contrary value tendencies. It is gangster rap and church choir with a macabre blend of lyrics and rhythm set to high pitch sirens of police cars and ambulances. Old Icons have fallen. They do not resonate with youth.
African American culture is no longer traditional because traditional icons no longer inspire hope and because it can no longer effectively regenerate its values through its offspring. It cannot pass on a vision of the future-its future, because it does not claim a vision of itself. It cannot see itself in the future.
The prison yard culture is more efficient and effective in transmitting its values to successive generations because its icons are simple and tied to the visceral impulse of its children. Guns, the snitch principle, baptism in prison as its rite of passage to its form of manhood, and its public vision through mass media give to it a commanding voice. ‘Sagging’ is in, everywhere. The children sign up on visiting day at the prison; they adapt to it. They have a passion for the lifestyle it engenders.
So another culture has taken root. It is denied to the peril of every citizen. It is the product of irrational social forces which have raged in the African American community for over forty years. In its wake, families, schools, churches, and governments have been laid economically and morally wasted.
Its seed, found in the dark hollows of prison, have found a fertile place to germinate and to grow undisturbed for two generations in historically dysfunctional prison cultures.
The same prison yard culture spreads its germinated seeds far and wide to every city. It has given rise to anti-culture. But what is anti-culture? It is nihilism. That means ‘the end’ because it is the negation of all that traditional culture has stood for and now feebly stands for as it is locked in the corner of the ring being beaten to death. It is not social change but the negation of any social change at all because it allows for no vital social functioning.
It is the inversion of traditional culture. It is ‘not being culture’ which consist of anti-values, that is, to be neither moral nor immoral but rather ‘not to value’ at all. It is ‘not to work’ as the value to be exchanged for value; that is to take from others and give nothing in return. It is ‘not respect for life’ but to drive the devaluation of life to utter nothingness. It is death.
The prison yard culture has its ritual. Its ritual of human devaluation is murder. Only the act of murder accomplishes the nothingness at the heart of its own being; its being is passé. That is because nothingness is the mirror image of the dead soul without the possibility for life.
Their dead souls have neither hope in the King dream nor in the democratic vision. They do not foresee a prosperous economic future for themselves either; it is the utter suspension of all anticipation and imaginative free-flow. It is ‘not being’; it is nothingness which drives them. This is what an increasing number of socially disabled parolees feel every officially damned day and night. Their epitaph is: ‘I don’t give a fuck’. And if you ever meet one enraged you had better believe it because they mean just that. That is why the city is dysfunctional.
Intelligent people in government especially the demographic statisticians could foresee the prospect of our current predicament forty years ago. They could see it in the numbers as clearly as we can see the glaciers on Greenland melting in real time. Yet, it happened. It happened because those politicians and corporate interests sought short term political and monetary gain rather than heed the long term warnings of social disaster. Now, it is a disaster.
Psychologists have long ago established that there is a correlation between frustration and aggression. So, we should not be surprised at the thirty year consistency of the murder rate in Oakland and other major cities. If public policy aims to protect the public health, safety, welfare, and morals, then those in charge of public policy formulation and implementation have been and are at least incompetent in their positions and at most complicit in the furtherance of the prison yard culture and thus acts of murder. In either case they should be recalled from office and they should be recalled from office by the public right now.
© Earth Colony 2013 All Rights Reserved.